Four current meter models compared in strong currents in Drake Passage

Thumbnail Image
Date
2013-10
Authors
Watts, D. Randolph
Kennelly, Maureen A.
Donohue, Kathleen A.
Tracey, Karen L.
Chereskin, Teresa K.
Weller, Robert A.
Victoria, Ivan
Alternative Title
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00032.1
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Currents
Acoustic measurements/effects
In situ oceanic observations
Instrumentation/sensors
Abstract
Seven current meters representing four models on a stiffly buoyed mooring were placed for an 11-month deployment to intercompare their velocity measurements: two vector-measuring current meters (VMCMs), two Aanderaa recording current meter (RCM) 11s, two Aanderaa SEAGUARDs, and a Nortek Aquadopp. The current meters were placed 6-m apart from each other at about 4000-m depth in an area of Drake Passage expected to have strong currents, nearly independent of depth near the bottom. Two high-current events occurred in bursts of semidiurnal pulses lasting several days, one with peak speeds up to 67 cm s−1 and the other above 35 cm s−1. The current-speed measurements all agreed within 7% of the median value when vector averaged over simultaneous time intervals. The VMCMs, chosen as the reference measurements, were found to measure the median of the mean-current magnitudes. The RCM11 and SEAGUARD current speeds agreed within 2% of the median at higher speeds (35–67 cm s−1), whereas in lower speed ranges (0–35 cm s−1) the vector-averaged speeds for the RCM11 and SEAGUARD were 4%–5% lower and 3%–5% higher than the median, respectively. The shorter-record Aquadopp current speeds were about 6% higher than the VMCMs over the range (0–40 cm s−1) encountered.
Description
Author Posting. © American Meteorological Society, 2013. This article is posted here by permission of American Meteorological Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 30 (2013): 2465–2477, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00032.1.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 30 (2013): 2465–2477
Cruises
Cruise ID
Cruise DOI
Vessel Name