Four current meter models compared in strong currents in Drake Passage

dc.contributor.author Watts, D. Randolph
dc.contributor.author Kennelly, Maureen A.
dc.contributor.author Donohue, Kathleen A.
dc.contributor.author Tracey, Karen L.
dc.contributor.author Chereskin, Teresa K.
dc.contributor.author Weller, Robert A.
dc.contributor.author Victoria, Ivan
dc.date.accessioned 2014-03-11T15:05:59Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-22T08:57:26Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10
dc.description Author Posting. © American Meteorological Society, 2013. This article is posted here by permission of American Meteorological Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 30 (2013): 2465–2477, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00032.1. en_US
dc.description.abstract Seven current meters representing four models on a stiffly buoyed mooring were placed for an 11-month deployment to intercompare their velocity measurements: two vector-measuring current meters (VMCMs), two Aanderaa recording current meter (RCM) 11s, two Aanderaa SEAGUARDs, and a Nortek Aquadopp. The current meters were placed 6-m apart from each other at about 4000-m depth in an area of Drake Passage expected to have strong currents, nearly independent of depth near the bottom. Two high-current events occurred in bursts of semidiurnal pulses lasting several days, one with peak speeds up to 67 cm s−1 and the other above 35 cm s−1. The current-speed measurements all agreed within 7% of the median value when vector averaged over simultaneous time intervals. The VMCMs, chosen as the reference measurements, were found to measure the median of the mean-current magnitudes. The RCM11 and SEAGUARD current speeds agreed within 2% of the median at higher speeds (35–67 cm s−1), whereas in lower speed ranges (0–35 cm s−1) the vector-averaged speeds for the RCM11 and SEAGUARD were 4%–5% lower and 3%–5% higher than the median, respectively. The shorter-record Aquadopp current speeds were about 6% higher than the VMCMs over the range (0–40 cm s−1) encountered. en_US
dc.description.embargo 2014-04-01 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by U.S. National Science Foundation Grants ANT-0635437 and ANT-0636493. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 30 (2013): 2465–2477 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00032.1
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/6472
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher American Meteorological Society en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00032.1
dc.subject Currents en_US
dc.subject Acoustic measurements/effects en_US
dc.subject In situ oceanic observations en_US
dc.subject Instrumentation/sensors en_US
dc.title Four current meter models compared in strong currents in Drake Passage en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 576eb164-cab8-463a-96c6-e0a254b12aac
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 252c735d-32b0-49e7-812c-8b49bdb5871a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 64acc4be-6b9f-4931-afdb-517d400130e3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 1e74fefe-ee29-4f8e-a62d-9ab730136b19
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0addebbe-3531-4690-a684-68ace5ff110d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication d05ca5d6-f7e4-485a-8a83-8ca3cb90633c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 5ae57411-22b0-4efe-86d0-9b9eb5d19bd4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 576eb164-cab8-463a-96c6-e0a254b12aac
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jtech-d-13-00032.1.pdf
Size:
4.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: