Data assimilative hindcast of the Gulf of Maine coastal circulation
Data assimilative hindcast of the Gulf of Maine coastal circulation
Date
2005-10-12
Authors
He, Ruoying
McGillicuddy, Dennis J.
Lynch, Daniel R.
Smith, Keston W.
Stock, Charles A.
Manning, James P.
McGillicuddy, Dennis J.
Lynch, Daniel R.
Smith, Keston W.
Stock, Charles A.
Manning, James P.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1029/2004JC002807
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Data assimilation
Coastal ocean modeling
Gulf of Maine circulation
Coastal ocean modeling
Gulf of Maine circulation
Abstract
A data assimilative model hindcast of the Gulf of Maine (GOM) coastal circulation during an 11 day field survey in early summer 2003 is presented. In situ observations include surface winds, coastal sea levels, and shelf hydrography as well as moored and shipboard acoustic Doppler D current profiler (ADCP) currents. The hindcast system consists of both forward and inverse models. The forward model is a three-dimensional, nonlinear finite element ocean circulation model, and the inverse models are its linearized frequency domain and time domain counterparts. The model hindcast assimilates both coastal sea levels and ADCP current measurements via the inversion for the unknown sea level open boundary conditions. Model skill is evaluated by the divergence of the observed and modeled drifter trajectories. A mean drifter divergence rate (1.78 km d−1) is found, demonstrating the utility of the inverse data assimilation modeling system in the coastal ocean setting. Model hindcast also reveals complicated hydrodynamic structures and synoptic variability in the GOM coastal circulation and their influences on coastal water material property transport. The complex bottom bathymetric setting offshore of Penobscot and Casco bays is shown to be able to generate local upwelling and downwelling that may be important in local plankton dynamics.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2005. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research 110 (2005): C10011, doi:10.1029/2004JC002807.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research 110 (2005): C10011