A surface mooring for air–sea interaction research in the Gulf Stream. Part II : analysis of the observations and their accuracies
A surface mooring for air–sea interaction research in the Gulf Stream. Part II : analysis of the observations and their accuracies
Date
2013-03
Authors
Bigorre, Sebastien P.
Weller, Robert A.
Edson, James B.
Ware, Jonathan D.
Weller, Robert A.
Edson, James B.
Ware, Jonathan D.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00078.1
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Atmosphere-ocean interaction
Buoy observations
Buoy observations
Abstract
A surface mooring was deployed in the Gulf Stream for 15 months to investigate the role of air–sea interaction in mode water formation and other processes. The accuracies of the near-surface meteorological and oceanographic measurements are investigated. In addition, the impacts of these measurement errors on the estimation and study of the air–sea fluxes in the Gulf Stream are discussed. Pre- and postdeployment calibrations together with in situ comparison between shipboard and moored sensors supported the identification of biases due to sensor drifts, sensor electronics, and calibration errors. A postdeployment field study was used to further investigate the performance of the wind sensors. The use of redundant sensor sets not only supported the filling of data gaps but also allowed an examination of the contribution of random errors. Air–sea fluxes were also analyzed and computed from both Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment (COARE) bulk parameterization and using direct covariance measurements. The basic conclusion is that the surface buoy deployed in the Gulf Stream to support air–sea interaction research was successful, providing an improved 15-month record of surface meteorology, upper-ocean variability, and air–sea fluxes with known accuracies. At the same time, the coincident deployment of mean meteorological and turbulent flux sensors proved to be a successful strategy to certify the validity of the bulk formula fluxes over the midrange of wind speeds and to support further work to address the present shortcomings of the bulk formula methods at the low and high wind speeds.
Description
Author Posting. © American Meteorological Society, 2013. This article is posted here by permission of American Meteorological Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 39 (2013): 450–469, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00078.1.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 39 (2013): 450–469