Tidal flow asymmetry owing to inertia and waves on an unstratified, shallow ebb shoal
Tidal flow asymmetry owing to inertia and waves on an unstratified, shallow ebb shoal
Date
2018-09-22
Authors
Wargula, Anna E.
Raubenheimer, Britt
Elgar, Steve
Chen, Jia-Lin
Shi, Fengyan
Traykovski, Peter A.
Raubenheimer, Britt
Elgar, Steve
Chen, Jia-Lin
Shi, Fengyan
Traykovski, Peter A.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1029/2017JC013625
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Inlets
Waves
Inertia
Tidal asymmetry
Ebb shoal
Waves
Inertia
Tidal asymmetry
Ebb shoal
Abstract
Observations of water levels, waves, currents, and bathymetry collected for a month at an unstratified tidal inlet with a shallow (1 to 2 m deep) ebb shoal are used to evaluate the asymmetry in flows and dynamics owing to inertia and waves. Along‐channel currents ranged from −1.5 to 0.6 m/s (positive inland) inside the main (3 to 5 m deep) channel crossing the ebb shoal. Net discharge is negligible, and ebb dominance of the channel flows is owing to inflow and outflow asymmetries near the inlet mouth. Offshore wave heights ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 m. During moderate to large wave events (offshore significant wave heights >1.2 m), wave forcing enhanced onshore mass flux near the shoal edge and inside the inlet, leading to reduced ebb flow dominance. Momentum balances estimated with the water depths, currents, and waves simulated with a quasi 3‐D numerical model reproduce the momentum balances estimated from the observations reasonably well. Both observations and simulations suggest that ebb‐dominant bottom stresses are balanced by the ebb‐dominant pressure gradient and the tidally asymmetric inertia, which is a sink (source) of momentum on flood (ebb). Simulations with and without waves suggest that waves drive local and nonlocal changes in the water levels and flows. Specifically, breaking waves at the offshore edge of the ebb shoal induce setup and partially block the ebb jet (local effects), which leads to a more onshore‐directed mass flux, changes to the advection across the ebb shoal, and increased water levels inside the inlet mouth (nonlocal effects).
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2018. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 123 (2018): 6779-6799, doi:10.1029/2017JC013625.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 123 (2018): 6779-6799