Time-dependent response of a zonally averaged ocean–atmosphere–sea ice model to Milankovitch forcing
Time-dependent response of a zonally averaged ocean–atmosphere–sea ice model to Milankovitch forcing
Date
2010-03
Authors
Antico, Andres
Marchal, Olivier
Mysak, Lawrence A.
Marchal, Olivier
Mysak, Lawrence A.
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Abstract
An ocean-atmosphere-sea ice model is developed to explore the time-dependent
response of climate to Milankovitch forcing for the time interval 5-3 Myr BP. The ocean
component is a zonally averaged model of the circulation in five basins (Arctic, Atlantic,
Indian, Pacific, and Southern Oceans). The atmospheric component is a one-dimensional
(latitudinal) energy balance model, and the sea-ice component is a thermodynamic model.
Two numerical experiments are conducted. The first experiment does not include sea ice
and the Arctic Ocean; the second experiment does. Results from the two experiments are
used to investigate (i) the response of annual mean surface air and ocean temperatures to
Milankovitch forcing, and (ii) the role of sea ice in this response.
In both experiments, the response of air temperature is dominated by obliquity cycles
at most latitudes. On the other hand, the response of ocean temperature varies with latitude
and depth. Deep water formed between 45°N-65°N in the Atlantic Ocean mainly responds
to precession. In contrast, deep water formed south of 60°S responds to obliquity when sea
ice is not included. Sea ice acts as a time-integrator of summer insolation changes such that
annual mean sea-ice conditions mainly respond to obliquity. Thus, in the presence of sea
ice, air temperature changes over the sea ice are amplified, and temperature changes in deep
water of southern origin are suppressed since water below sea ice is kept near the freezing
point.
Description
Author Posting. © The Author(s), 2010. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Springer-Verlag for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Climate Dynamics 6 (2010): 763-779, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0790-6.