Dynamic response of electromagnetic current meters

dc.contributor.author Aubrey, David G.
dc.contributor.author Spencer, Wayne D.
dc.contributor.author Trowbridge, John H.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-12-14T19:50:36Z
dc.date.available 2016-12-14T19:50:36Z
dc.date.issued 1984-05
dc.description.abstract The dynamic response of electromagnetic current meters (manufactured by Marsh-McBirney, Inc.) has been clarified through a comprehensive laboratory measurement program combined with a thorough literature review. Elucidation of the behavior of these flowmeters under a variety of dynamic conditions has been neglected in the past. Since flow past a spherical body has considerable hydrodynamic complexity for different dynamic conditions, a careful laboratory study was carried out for pure steady, pure oscillatory (horizontal plane), and combined steady/oscillatory conditions at two test facilities. Test results indicate that flowmeter behavior under pure steady flow is excellent in the absence of high levels of free-stream turbulence, with an r.m.s. error of 1-5 cm/sec. These errors could· be reduced with a higher-order polynomial regression fit. Pure oscillatory response was also excellent, with r.m.s. errors of 1-2 cm/sec, and sensitivity which is correlated with the oscillatory Reynolds number, (Re)o, and the Keulegan-Carpenter number, (A/d). Combined steady/oscillatory flows degraded current meter performance with larger residual errors (1-6 em/sec) and significant differences in sensitivity (up to 20°/o). Horizontal cosine response showed systematic deviations from pure cosine behavior, with a notable inter-cardinal undersensitivity and cosine "shoulder" at lower Reynolds numbers. Error analysis shows these current sensors are adequate for many kinematic measurements, but may lead to excessive errors when using velocity to calculate dynamical quantities (such as bottom friction, Reynolds Stress, or log-layer friction velocities). A careful error analysis must precede any use of these meters for estimating dynamical quantities. These studies pointed out a potential difficulty in using these meters in areas of large ambient turbulence levels (20°/o turbulent intensities), which are characteristic of many near-bottom shallow water environments. Further study is needed to clarify this behavior. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, under contract DACW/2-82-C-0014; work was initiated with funding from the NOAA National Office of Sea Grant under grant number NA80-AA-D-00077; the Coastal Research Center of the Woods Hole Qceanographic Institution provided support. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Aubrey, D. G., Spencer, W. D., & Trowbridge, J. H. (1984). Dynamic response of electromagnetic current meters. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. https://doi.org/10.1575/1912/8595
dc.identifier.doi 10.1575/1912/8595
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/8595
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries WHOI Technical Reports en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries WHOI-84-20 en_US
dc.subject Ocean currents en_US
dc.subject Water current meters en_US
dc.subject Oceanographic instruments en_US
dc.title Dynamic response of electromagnetic current meters en_US
dc.type Technical Report en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 7457cec4-50de-4413-b24f-1b6e629cdc84
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 47a5a5b8-8f3a-442d-ae06-a436262e4752
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 3377f151-a0f7-4763-b3b4-bbb39c41ae40
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 7457cec4-50de-4413-b24f-1b6e629cdc84
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
WHOI 84-20.pdf
Size:
68.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: