Evapotranspiration in Northern Eurasia : impact of forcing uncertainties on terrestrial ecosystem model estimates
Evapotranspiration in Northern Eurasia : impact of forcing uncertainties on terrestrial ecosystem model estimates
Date
2015-04-03
Authors
Liu, Yaling
Zhuang, Qianlai
Miralles, Diego
Pan, Zhihua
Kicklighter, David W.
Zhu, Qing
He, Yujie
Chen, Jiquan
Tchebakova, Nadja M.
Sirin, Andrey
Niyogi, Dev
Melillo, Jerry M.
Zhuang, Qianlai
Miralles, Diego
Pan, Zhihua
Kicklighter, David W.
Zhu, Qing
He, Yujie
Chen, Jiquan
Tchebakova, Nadja M.
Sirin, Andrey
Niyogi, Dev
Melillo, Jerry M.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Files
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1002/2014JD022531
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Evapotranspiration
Northern Eurasia
Terrestrial ecosystem model
Climate reanalysis
Forcing uncertainty
Northern Eurasia
Terrestrial ecosystem model
Climate reanalysis
Forcing uncertainty
Abstract
The ecosystems in Northern Eurasia (NE) play an important role in the global water cycle and the climate system. While evapotranspiration (ET) is a critical variable to understand this role, ET over this region remains largely unstudied. Using an improved version of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model with five widely used forcing data sets, we examine the impact that uncertainties in climate forcing data have on the magnitude, variability, and dominant climatic drivers of ET for the period 1979–2008. Estimates of regional average ET vary in the range of 241.4–335.7 mm yr−1 depending on the choice of forcing data. This range corresponds to as much as 32% of the mean ET. Meanwhile, the spatial patterns of long-term average ET across NE are generally consistent for all forcing data sets. Our ET estimates in NE are largely affected by uncertainties in precipitation (P), air temperature (T), incoming shortwave radiation (R), and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). During the growing season, the correlations between ET and each forcing variable indicate that T is the dominant factor in the north and P in the south. Unsurprisingly, the uncertainties in climate forcing data propagate as well to estimates of the volume of water available for runoff (here defined as P-ET). While the Climate Research Unit data set is overall the best choice of forcing data in NE according to our assessment, the quality of these forcing data sets remains a major challenge to accurately quantify the regional water balance in NE.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2015. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 120 (2015): 2647–2660, doi:10.1002/2014JD022531.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 120 (2015): 2647–2660