Ice sheet–derived submarine groundwater discharge on Greenland's continental shelf
Ice sheet–derived submarine groundwater discharge on Greenland's continental shelf
Date
2011-07-28
Authors
DeFoor, Whitney
Person, Mark
Larsen, Hans Christian
Lizarralde, Daniel
Cohen, Denis
Dugan, Brandon
Person, Mark
Larsen, Hans Christian
Lizarralde, Daniel
Cohen, Denis
Dugan, Brandon
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Files
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1029/2011WR010536
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Greenland
Freshwater emplacement
Hydrogeology
Ice sheet
Submarine discharge
Freshwater emplacement
Hydrogeology
Ice sheet
Submarine discharge
Abstract
Isotopically light (−1‰ to −8‰ δ18O) and fresh pore fluids (300–520 mM Cl−) were found in continental shelf sediments up to 100 km offshore of southeastern (SE) Greenland, suggesting infiltration and mixing of ice sheet meltwater with seawater to depths of 260 m. These geochemical anomalies may be associated with ice sheet–derived submarine groundwater discharge (SMGD). We present a continental-scale reconstruction of the late Pleistocene hydrogeology of SE Greenland using finite element analysis that incorporates ice sheet loading and solute and isotope transport. Results indicate that subglacial infiltration and SMGD are of the same order of magnitude and are highly dependent on the permeability of the subaerial basalt. Simulated infiltration and SMGD almost doubled during the Last Glacial Maximum, compared to ice-free conditions. Much of the present-day glacially induced groundwater discharge occurs on land. Subice infiltration on the continental shelf likely represents a mixture of seawater and meltwater during past glacial maximums. Simulated SMGD during the most recent interval of glacial retreat is about 4% of the total ice sheet melting. At present, the simulated rate of SMGD is about 11% of the estimated current melting rate.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2011. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Water Resources Research 47 (2011): W07549, doi:10.1029/2011WR010536.
Embargo Date
Citation
Water Resources Research 47 (2011): W07549