Frontal dynamics of a buoyancy‐driven coastal current : quantifying buoyancy, wind, and isopycnal tilting influence on the Nova Scotia Current
Date
2018-07-28Author
Dever, Mathieu
Concept link
Skagseth, Øystein
Concept link
Drinkwater, Ken F.
Concept link
Hebert, David
Concept link
Metadata
Show full item recordCitable URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1912/10562As published
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JC013338DOI
10.1029/2017JC013338Abstract
The focus of this study is on the relative roles of winds and buoyancy in driving the Nova Scotia Current (NSC) utilizing detailed hydrographic glider transects along the Halifax Line. We define a Hydrographic Wind Index (HWI) using a simplistic two‐layer model to represent the NSC and its frontal system. The HWI is based on local characteristics of the density front extracted from the glider data (e.g., frontal slope). The impact of wind‐driven isopycnal tilting on the frontal slope is estimated and corrected for to accurately scale the buoyancy‐driven component of the NSC. Observations from independent current profilers deployed across the NSC confirm that the HWI captures the low‐frequency variability of the NSC. The monthly wind‐driven flow is estimated to represent between 1.0% (±0.1%) and 48% (±1%) of the total alongshore currents, with a yearly mean of about 36% (±1%). We demonstrate that using local conditions is more appropriate to the study of buoyancy‐driven currents ranging over distances on the order of urn:x-wiley:jgrc:media:jgrc22972:jgrc22972-math-0001(100 km), compared to the traditional approach based on upstream conditions. Contrary to the traditional approach, the HWI is not affected by the advective time lag associated with the downshelf propagation of the buoyant water coming from the upstream source. However, the HWI approach requires high‐resolution data sets, as errors on the estimates of the buoyancy‐ and wind‐driven flows become large as the sampling resolution decreases. Despite being data intensive, we argue that the HWI is also applicable to multisource currents, where upstream conditions are difficult to define.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2018. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 123 (2018): 4988-5003, doi:10.1029/2017JC013338.
Collections
Suggested Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 123 (2018): 4988-5003Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
A coastal current in winter : 2. Wind forcing and cooling of a coastal current east of Cape Cod
Shcherbina, Andrey Y.; Gawarkiewicz, Glen G. (American Geophysical Union, 2008-10-18)The combined effect of cooling and wind-driven buoyancy flux (WDBF) on a buoyant coastal current east of Cape Cod is investigated using observations and process-oriented numerical modeling. Theoretical considerations show ... -
Laboratory experiments on the interaction of a buoyant coastal current with a canyon : application to the East Greenland Current
Sutherland, David A.; Cenedese, Claudia (American Meteorological Society, 2009-05)This paper presents a set of laboratory experiments focused on how a buoyant coastal current flowing over a sloping bottom interacts with a canyon and what controls the separation, if any, of the current from the upstream ... -
Stability of a buoyancy-driven coastal current at the shelf break
Cenedese, Claudia; Linden, P. F. (Cambridge University Press, 2002-02-15)Buoyancy-driven surface currents were generated in the laboratory by releasing buoyant fluid from a source adjacent to a vertical boundary in a rotating container. Different bottom topographies that simulate both a continental ...