Incorporating the image formation process into deep learning improves network performance
Incorporating the image formation process into deep learning improves network performance
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022-10-31
Authors
Li, Yue
Su, Yijun
Guo, Min
Han, Xiaofei
Liu, Jiamin
Vishwasrao, Harshad D
Li, Xuesong
Christensen, Ryan
Sengupta, Titas
Moyle, Mark W
Rey-Suarez, Ivan
Chen, Jiji
Upadhyaya, Arpita
Usdin, Ted B
Colón-Ramos, Daniel Alfonso
Liu, Huafeng
Wu, Yicong
Shroff, Hari
Su, Yijun
Guo, Min
Han, Xiaofei
Liu, Jiamin
Vishwasrao, Harshad D
Li, Xuesong
Christensen, Ryan
Sengupta, Titas
Moyle, Mark W
Rey-Suarez, Ivan
Chen, Jiji
Upadhyaya, Arpita
Usdin, Ted B
Colón-Ramos, Daniel Alfonso
Liu, Huafeng
Wu, Yicong
Shroff, Hari
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1038/s41592-022-01652-7
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Fluorescence imaging
Machine learning
Machine learning
Abstract
We present Richardson–Lucy network (RLN), a fast and lightweight deep learning method for three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy deconvolution. RLN combines the traditional Richardson–Lucy iteration with a fully convolutional network structure, establishing a connection to the image formation process and thereby improving network performance. Containing only roughly 16,000 parameters, RLN enables four- to 50-fold faster processing than purely data-driven networks with many more parameters. By visual and quantitative analysis, we show that RLN provides better deconvolution, better generalizability and fewer artifacts than other networks, especially along the axial dimension. RLN outperforms classic Richardson–Lucy deconvolution on volumes contaminated with severe out of focus fluorescence or noise and provides four- to sixfold faster reconstructions of large, cleared-tissue datasets than classic multi-view pipelines. We demonstrate RLN’s performance on cells, tissues and embryos imaged with widefield-, light-sheet-, confocal- and super-resolution microscopy.
Description
© The Author(s), 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Li, Y., Su, Y., Guo, M., Han, X., Liu, J., Vishwasrao, H., Li, X., Christensen, R., Sengupta, T., Moyle, M., Rey-Suarez, I., Chen, J., Upadhyaya, A., Usdin, T., Colón-Ramos, D., Liu, H., Wu, Y., & Shroff, H. Incorporating the image formation process into deep learning improves network performance. Nature Methods, 19(11), (2022): 1427–1437, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01652-7.
Embargo Date
Citation
Li, Y., Su, Y., Guo, M., Han, X., Liu, J., Vishwasrao, H., Li, X., Christensen, R., Sengupta, T., Moyle, M., Rey-Suarez, I., Chen, J., Upadhyaya, A., Usdin, T., Colón-Ramos, D., Liu, H., Wu, Y., & Shroff, H. (2022). Incorporating the image formation process into deep learning improves network performance. Nature Methods, 19(11), 1427–1437.