Detecting aseismic strain transients from seismicity data
Detecting aseismic strain transients from seismicity data
Date
2011-06-17
Authors
Llenos, Andrea L.
McGuire, Jeffrey J.
McGuire, Jeffrey J.
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1029/2010JB007537
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
ETAS model
Rate-state model
Earthquake triggering
Rate-state model
Earthquake triggering
Abstract
Aseismic deformation transients such as fluid flow, magma migration, and slow slip can trigger changes in seismicity rate. We present a method that can detect these seismicity rate variations and utilize these anomalies to constrain the underlying variations in stressing rate. Because ordinary aftershock sequences often obscure changes in the background seismicity caused by aseismic processes, we combine the stochastic Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence model that describes aftershock sequences well and the physically based rate- and state-dependent friction seismicity model into a single seismicity rate model that models both aftershock activity and changes in background seismicity rate. We implement this model into a data assimilation algorithm that inverts seismicity catalogs to estimate space-time variations in stressing rate. We evaluate the method using a synthetic catalog, and then apply it to a catalog of M ≥ 1.5 events that occurred in the Salton Trough from 1990 to 2009. We validate our stressing rate estimates by comparing them to estimates from a geodetically derived slip model for a large creep event on the Obsidian Buttes fault. The results demonstrate that our approach can identify large aseismic deformation transients in a multidecade long earthquake catalog and roughly constrain the absolute magnitude of the stressing rate transients. Our method can therefore provide a way to detect aseismic transients in regions where geodetic resolution in space or time is poor.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2011. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research 116 (2011): B06305, doi:10.1029/2010JB007537.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research 116 (2011): B06305