Long-term CO2 enrichment of a forest ecosystem : implications for forest regeneration and succession

dc.contributor.author Mohan, Jacqueline E.
dc.contributor.author Clark, James S.
dc.contributor.author Schlesinger, William H.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-07-14T19:52:47Z
dc.date.available 2011-07-14T19:52:47Z
dc.date.issued 2007-06
dc.description Author Posting. © Ecological Society of America, 2007. This article is posted here by permission of Ecological Society of America for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Ecological Applications 17 (2007): 1198–1212, doi:10.1890/05-1690. en_US
dc.description.abstract The composition and successional status of a forest affect carbon storage and net ecosystem productivity, yet it remains unclear whether elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) will impact rates and trajectories of forest succession. We examined how CO2 enrichment (+200 μL CO2/L air differential) affects forest succession through growth and survivorship of tree seedlings, as part of the Duke Forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment in North Carolina, USA. We planted 2352 seedlings of 14 species in the low light forest understory and determined effects of elevated CO2 on individual plant growth, survival, and total sample biomass accumulation, an integrator of plant growth and survivorship over time, for six years. We used a hierarchical Bayes framework to accommodate the uncertainty associated with the availability of light and the variability in growth among individual plants. We found that most species did not exhibit strong responses to CO2. Ulmus alata (+21%), Quercus alba (+9.5%), and nitrogen-fixing Robinia pseudoacacia (+230%) exhibited greater mean annual relative growth rates under elevated CO2 than under ambient conditions. The effects of CO2 were small relative to variability within populations; however, some species grew better under low light conditions when exposed to elevated CO2 than they did under ambient conditions. These species include shade-intolerant Liriodendron tulipifera and Liquidambar styraciflua, intermediate-tolerant Quercus velutina, and shade-tolerant Acer barbatum, A. rubrum, Prunus serotina,Ulmus alata, and Cercis canadensis. Contrary to our expectation, shade-intolerant trees did not survive better with CO2 enrichment, and population-scale responses to CO2 were influenced by survival probabilities in low light. CO2 enrichment did not increase rates of sample biomass accumulation for most species, but it did stimulate biomass growth of shade-tolerant taxa, particularly Acer barbatum and Ulmus alata. Our data suggest a small CO2 fertilization effect on tree productivity, and the possibility of reduced carbon accumulation rates relative to today's forests due to changes in species composition. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This research was supported by the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy, Grant No. DE-FG02-95ER62083, and by Terrestrial Ecosystems and Global Change (TECO) Grant No. DE-F602-97ER62463. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Ecological Applications 17 (2007): 1198–1212 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1890/05-1690
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/4692
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Ecological Society of America en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1890/05-1690
dc.subject Bayesian analysis en_US
dc.subject Carbon dioxide (CO2) enrichment en_US
dc.subject Forest succession en_US
dc.subject Global change en_US
dc.subject Hierarchical Bayes en_US
dc.title Long-term CO2 enrichment of a forest ecosystem : implications for forest regeneration and succession en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication ed9b6a08-3e95-483a-a70b-1a661abb537b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0eb953d8-b26e-470e-bfed-35500411830c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication e5e0f815-4739-4e46-beb2-664348e514ef
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ed9b6a08-3e95-483a-a70b-1a661abb537b
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
05-1690.pdf
Size:
268.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: