Ecotypic differences in the phenology of the tundra species Eriophorum vaginatum reflect sites of origin

dc.contributor.author Parker, Thomas C.
dc.contributor.author Tang, Jianwu
dc.contributor.author Clark, Mahalia B.
dc.contributor.author Moody, Michael L.
dc.contributor.author Fetcher, Ned
dc.date.accessioned 2017-12-26T19:12:23Z
dc.date.available 2017-12-26T19:12:23Z
dc.date.issued 2017-10-19
dc.description © The Author(s), 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Ecology and Evolution 7 (2017): 9775–9786, doi:10.1002/ece3.3445. en_US
dc.description.abstract Eriophorum vaginatum is a tussock-forming sedge that contributes significantly to the structure and primary productivity of moist acidic tussock tundra. Locally adapted populations (ecotypes) have been identified across the geographical distribution of E. vaginatum; however, little is known about how their growth and phenology differ over the course of a growing season. The growing season is short in the Arctic and therefore exerts a strong selection pressure on tundra species. This raises the hypothesis that the phenology of arctic species may be poorly adapted if the timing and length of the growing season change. Mature E. vaginatum tussocks from across a latitudinal gradient (65–70°N) were transplanted into a common garden at a central location (Toolik Lake, 68°38′N, 149°36′W) where half were warmed using open-top chambers. Over two growing seasons (2015 and 2016), leaf length was measured weekly to track growth rates, timing of senescence, and biomass accumulation. Growth rates were similar across ecotypes and between years and were not affected by warming. However, southern populations accumulated significantly more biomass, largely because they started to senesce later. In 2016, peak biomass and senescence of most populations occurred later than in 2015, probably induced by colder weather at the beginning of the growing season in 2016, which caused a delayed start to growth. The finish was delayed as well. Differences in phenology between populations were largely retained between years, suggesting that the amount of time that these ecotypes grow has been selected by the length of the growing seasons at their respective home sites. As potential growing seasons lengthen, E. vaginatum may be unable to respond appropriately as a result of genetic control and may have reduced fitness in the rapidly warming Arctic tundra. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship National Science Foundation Grant Numbers: 1417645, 1417763, 1418010 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Ecology and Evolution 7 (2017): 9775–9786 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/ece3.3445
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/9440
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher John Wiley & Sons en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3445
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.subject Arctic tundra en_US
dc.subject Common garden en_US
dc.subject Ecotypes en_US
dc.subject Eriophorum vaginatum en_US
dc.subject Growing season length en_US
dc.subject Local adaptation en_US
dc.subject Phenology en_US
dc.subject Senescence en_US
dc.title Ecotypic differences in the phenology of the tundra species Eriophorum vaginatum reflect sites of origin en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4c650d42-678e-46c4-b87f-e4eeffb703e4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication df7c7729-e9c3-4901-a812-39298078a5e7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c1443bcc-dae7-4247-9bf2-55000ae3b02e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication ce811444-4362-40b9-81c3-1c1c0d8cf7ed
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 53c8900f-66cf-458a-8437-93c1e6c9f149
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 4c650d42-678e-46c4-b87f-e4eeffb703e4
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Parker_et_al-2017-Ecology_and_Evolution.pdf
Size:
557.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ece33445-sup-0001-FigS1.docx
Size:
53.36 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word
Description:
Supporting information
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: