An experimental benchmark for geoacoustic inversion methods

dc.contributor.author Bonnel, Julien
dc.contributor.author Pecknold, Sean
dc.contributor.author Hines, Paul C.
dc.contributor.author Chapman, Ross
dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-30T19:45:54Z
dc.date.available 2021-03-30T19:45:54Z
dc.date.issued 2020-01-17
dc.description © The Author(s), 2021. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Bonnel, J., Pecknold, S. P., Hines, P. C., & Chapman, N. R. An experimental benchmark for geoacoustic inversion methods. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 46(1), (2021): 261-282, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2019.2960879. en_US
dc.description.abstract Over the past 25 years, there has been significant research activity in development and application of methods for inverting acoustical field data to estimate parameters of geoacoustic models of the ocean bottom. Although the performance of various geoacoustic inversion methods has been benchmarked on simulated data, their performance with experimental data remains an open question. This article constitutes the first attempt of an experimental benchmark of geoacoustic inversion methods. To do so, the article focuses on data from experiments carried out at a common site during the Shallow Water 2006 (SW06) experiment. The contribution of the article is twofold. First, the article provides an overview of experimental inversion methods and results obtained with SW06 data. Second, the article proposes and uses quantitative metrics to assess the experimental performance of inversion methods. From a sonar performance point of view, the benchmark shows that no particular geoacoustic inversion method is definitely better than any other of the ones that were tested. All the inversion methods generated adequate sound-speed profiles, but only a few methods estimated attenuation and density. Also, acoustical field prediction performance drastically reduces with range for all geoacoustic models, and this performance loss dominates over intermodel variability. Overall, the benchmark covers the two main objectives of geoacoustic inversion: obtaining geophysical information about the seabed, and/or predicting acoustic propagation in a given area. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Funding Agency: U.S. Office of Naval Research; Ocean Acoustics; en_US
dc.identifier.citation Bonnel, J., Pecknold, S. P., Hines, P. C., & Chapman, N. R. (2021). An experimental benchmark for geoacoustic inversion methods. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 46(1), 261-282. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1109/JOE.2019.2960879
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/26891
dc.publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2019.2960879
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.subject Oceans en_US
dc.subject Benchmark testing en_US
dc.subject Geoacoustic inversion en_US
dc.subject Data models en_US
dc.subject Sediments en_US
dc.subject Conferences en_US
dc.title An experimental benchmark for geoacoustic inversion methods en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication ac7519cf-50bb-45d1-ad9b-022c8185a7ec
relation.isAuthorOfPublication e536382f-a791-4f55-a2ee-09886313e4cb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 811ec593-b128-4920-a4a9-b707c08b4292
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6ff8b66b-8f94-4f2f-8059-2ce8cd1241ab
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac7519cf-50bb-45d1-ad9b-022c8185a7ec
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
08962151.pdf
Size:
3.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: