Evaluation of the Southern Ocean O2/Ar-based NCP estimates in a model framework

dc.contributor.author Jonsson, Bror F.
dc.contributor.author Doney, Scott C.
dc.contributor.author Dunne, John P.
dc.contributor.author Bender, Michael L.
dc.date.accessioned 2013-11-12T21:35:40Z
dc.date.available 2013-11-12T21:35:40Z
dc.date.issued 2013-04-02
dc.description Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2013. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 118 (2013): 385–399, doi:10.1002/jgrg.20032. en_US
dc.description.abstract The sea-air biological O2 flux assessed from measurements of surface O2 supersaturation in excess of Ar supersaturation (“O2 bioflux”) is increasingly being used to constrain net community production (NCP) in the upper ocean mixed layer. In making these calculations, one generally assumes that NCP is at steady state, mixed layer depth is constant, and there is no O2 exchange across the base of the mixed layer. The object of this paper is to evaluate the magnitude of errors introduced by violations of these assumptions. Therefore, we examine the differences between the sea-air biological O2 flux and NCP in the Southern Ocean mixed layer as calculated using two ocean biogeochemistry general circulation models. In this approach, NCP is considered a known entity in the prognostic model, whereas O2 bioflux is estimated using the model-predicted O2/Ar ratio to compute the mixed layer biological O2 saturation and the gas transfer velocity to calculate flux. We find that the simulated biological O2 flux gives an accurate picture of the regional-scale patterns and trends in model NCP. However, on local scales, violations of the assumptions behind the O2/Ar method lead to significant, non-uniform differences between model NCP and biological O2 flux. These errors arise from two main sources. First, venting of biological O2 to the atmosphere can be misaligned from NCP in both time and space. Second, vertical fluxes of oxygen across the base of the mixed layer complicate the relationship between NCP and the biological O2 flux. Our calculations show that low values of O2 bioflux correctly register that NCP is also low (<10 mmol m−2 day−1), but fractional errors are large when rates are this low. Values between 10 and 40 mmol m−2 day−1 in areas with intermediate mixed layer depths of 30 to 50 m have the smallest absolute and relative errors. Areas with O2 bioflux higher than 30 mmol m−2 day−1 and mixed layers deeper than 40 m tend to underestimate NCP by up to 20 mmol m−2 day−1. Excluding time periods when mixed layer biological O2 is undersaturated, O2 bioflux underestimates time-averaged NCP by 5%–15%. If these time periods are included, O2 bioflux underestimates mixed layer NCP by 20%–35% in the Southern Ocean. The higher error estimate is relevant if one wants to estimate seasonal NCP since a significant amount of biological production takes place when mixed layer biological O2 is undersaturated. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported in part by funding from the National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA NNX08AF12G) and National Science Foundation (NSF OPP-0823101). en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 118 (2013): 385–399 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/jgrg.20032
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/6296
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher John Wiley & Sons en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20032
dc.subject Biological production en_US
dc.subject Southern Ocean en_US
dc.subject O2/Ar en_US
dc.subject Modeling en_US
dc.subject Oxygen en_US
dc.subject GCM en_US
dc.title Evaluation of the Southern Ocean O2/Ar-based NCP estimates in a model framework en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication f0fec384-4ce4-41a7-ab02-085c906576ed
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 45476822-bfc7-40f7-8a24-792f1847263a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6f82568f-b25d-48cd-8ea3-150cf361c4e4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 353609ca-3ecd-437b-9178-a3b050eefa9f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery f0fec384-4ce4-41a7-ab02-085c906576ed
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jgrg20032.pdf
Size:
4.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: