Investigating the effect of enhanced oil recovery on the noble gas signature of casing gases and produced waters from selected California oil fields

dc.contributor.author Tyne, Rebecca L.
dc.contributor.author Barry, Peter H.
dc.contributor.author Karolytė, Rūta
dc.contributor.author Byrne, David J.
dc.contributor.author Kulongoski, Justin T.
dc.contributor.author Hillegonds, Darren
dc.contributor.author Ballentine, Christopher J.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-14T21:43:30Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-14T21:43:30Z
dc.date.issued 2021-09-25
dc.description © The Author(s), 2021. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Tyne, R. L., Barry, P. H., Karolyte, R., Byrne, D. J., Kulongoski, J. T., Hillegonds, D. J., & Ballentine, C. J. Investigating the effect of enhanced oil recovery on the noble gas signature of casing gases and produced waters from selected California oil fields. Chemical Geology, 584, (2021): 120540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120540. en_US
dc.description.abstract In regions where water resources are scarce and in high demand, it is important to safeguard against contamination of groundwater aquifers by oil-field fluids (water, gas, oil). In this context, the geochemical characterisation of these fluids is critical so that anthropogenic contaminants can be readily identified. The first step is characterising pre-development geochemical fluid signatures (i.e., those unmodified by hydrocarbon resource development) and understanding how these signatures may have been perturbed by resource production, particularly in the context of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques. Here, we present noble gas isotope data in fluids produced from oil wells in several water-stressed regions in California, USA, where EOR is prevalent. In oil-field systems, only casing gases are typically collected and measured for their noble gas compositions, even when oil and/or water phases are present, due to the relative ease of gas analyses. However, this approach relies on a number of assumptions (e.g., equilibrium between phases, water-to-oil ratio (WOR) and gas-to-oil ratio (GOR) in order to reconstruct the multiphase subsurface compositions. Here, we adopt a novel, more rigorous approach, and measure noble gases in both casing gas and produced fluid (oil-water-gas mixtures) samples from the Lost Hills, Fruitvale, North and South Belridge (San Joaquin Basin, SJB) and Orcutt (Santa Maria Basin) Oil Fields. Using this method, we are able to fully characterise the distribution of noble gases within a multiphase hydrocarbon system. We find that measured concentrations in the casing gases agree with those in the gas phase in the produced fluids and thus the two sample types can be used essentially interchangeably. EOR signatures can readily be identified by their distinct air-derived noble gas elemental ratios (e.g., 20Ne/36Ar), which are elevated compared to pre-development oil-field fluids, and conspicuously trend towards air values with respect to elemental ratios and overall concentrations. We reconstruct reservoir 20Ne/36Ar values using both casing gas and produced fluids and show that noble gas ratios in the reservoir are strongly correlated (r2 = 0.88–0.98) to the amount of water injected within ~500 m of a well. We suggest that the 20Ne/36Ar increase resulting from injection is sensitive to the volume of fluid interacting with the injectate, the effective water-to-oil ratio, and the composition of the injectate. Defining both the pre-development and injection-modified hydrocarbon reservoir compositions are crucial for distinguishing the sources of hydrocarbons observed in proximal groundwaters, and for quantifying the transport mechanisms controlling this occurrence. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council studentship to R.L.Tyne (Grant ref. NE/L002612/1) and the U.S. Geological Survey (Grant ref. 15-080-250), as part of the California State Water Resource Control Board's Oil and Gas Regional Groundwater Monitoring Program (RMP). en_US
dc.identifier.citation Tyne, R. L., Barry, P. H., Karolyte, R., Byrne, D. J., Kulongoski, J. T., Hillegonds, D. J., & Ballentine, C. J. (2021). Investigating the effect of enhanced oil recovery on the noble gas signature of casing gases and produced waters from selected California oil fields. Chemical Geology, 584, 120540. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120540
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/27818
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120540
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.subject Noble gas isotopes en_US
dc.subject Produced fluids en_US
dc.subject Casing gas en_US
dc.subject Enhanced oil recovery en_US
dc.subject Hydrocarbon systems en_US
dc.title Investigating the effect of enhanced oil recovery on the noble gas signature of casing gases and produced waters from selected California oil fields en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 85ec551b-050e-4b7d-a67d-f211abce07d2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 02304c2a-31c2-4e7e-a2b6-07894d6e180c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication e250435a-d0dd-4316-9566-0ea12395ca8b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 1f82d954-26c6-490e-98a2-8875a4c182e6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication a701a933-b354-4907-abef-b5fe4454eecc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4ceefc02-856b-4311-9673-f91d140c3cfb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4c25ecec-4a2d-4303-b0c6-37ca85400118
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 85ec551b-050e-4b7d-a67d-f211abce07d2
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0009254121004836-main.pdf
Size:
4.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0009254121004836-mmc1.pdf
Size:
604.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary_Figures
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0009254121004836-mmc2.pdf
Size:
322.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary_information
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1-s2.0-S0009254121004836-mmc3.xlsx
Size:
45.03 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel
Description:
Supplementary_Tables
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: