Should AMOC observations continue: how and why?
Should AMOC observations continue: how and why?
dc.contributor.author | Frajka-Williams, Eleanor | |
dc.contributor.author | Foukal, Nicholas P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Danabasoglu, Gokhan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-22T15:48:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-22T15:48:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-10-23 | |
dc.description | © The Author(s), 2023. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Frajka-Williams, E., Foukal, N., & Danabasoglu, G. (2023). Should AMOC observations continue: How and why? Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 381(2262), 20220195, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0195. | |
dc.description.abstract | The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is a large-scale circulation pattern responsible for northward heat transport in the Atlantic and is associated with climate variations on a wide range of time scales. Observing the time-varying AMOC has fundamentally changed our understanding of the large-scale ocean circulation and its interaction with the climate system, as well as identified shortcomings in numerical simulations. With a wide range of gains already achieved, some now ask whether AMOC observations should continue. A measured approach is required for a future observing system that addresses identified gaps in understanding, accounts for shortcomings in observing methods and maximizes the potential to guide improvements in ocean and climate models. Here, we outline a perspective on future AMOC observing and steps that the community should consider to move forward. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | N.F. acknowledges the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Endowed Fund for Innovative Research at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and NSF grant number 2047952, G.D. acknowledges that this material is also based upon work supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the US National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No. 1852977. E.F.-W. acknowledges support from the European Union, Horizon Europe project Explaining and Predicting the Ocean Conveyor (EPOC), grant number 101059547. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Frajka-Williams, E., Foukal, N., & Danabasoglu, G. (2023). Should AMOC observations continue: How and why? Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 381(2262), 20220195. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1098/rsta.2022.0195 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1912/70315 | |
dc.publisher | Royal Society | |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0195 | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | AMOC | |
dc.subject | Overturning | |
dc.subject | Ocean observations | |
dc.title | Should AMOC observations continue: how and why? | |
dc.type | Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | a6cb4b7b-849e-4239-bc60-ea3bd2619ee6 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 93ac3732-5aeb-4c22-b608-15457d5865c5 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 93706072-15b6-4109-bc27-6f0797ef9913 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | a6cb4b7b-849e-4239-bc60-ea3bd2619ee6 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Frajka-WilliamsE_2023.pdf
- Size:
- 859.78 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: