Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations

dc.contributor.author Weber, Laura
dc.contributor.author DeForce, Emelia A.
dc.contributor.author Apprill, Amy
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-17T16:23:14Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-17T16:23:14Z
dc.date.issued 2017-02-08
dc.description © The Author(s), 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Microbiome 5 (2017): 18, doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0229-y. en_US
dc.description.abstract We designed a two-phase study in order to propose a comprehensive and efficient method for DNA extraction from microbial cells present in corals and investigate if extraction method influences microbial community composition. During phase I, total DNA was extracted from seven coral species in a replicated experimental design using four different MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., DNA Isolation kits: PowerSoil®, PowerPlant® Pro, PowerBiofilm®, and UltraClean® Tissue & Cells (with three homogenization permutations). Technical performance of the treatments was evaluated using DNA yield and amplification efficiency of small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU ribosomal RNA (rRNA)) genes. During phase II, potential extraction biases were examined via microbial community analysis of SSU rRNA gene sequences amplified from the most successful DNA extraction treatments. In phase I of the study, the PowerSoil® and PowerPlant® Pro extracts contained low DNA concentrations, amplified poorly, and were not investigated further. Extracts from PowerBiofilm® and UltraClean® Tissue and Cells permutations were further investigated in phase II, and analysis of sequences demonstrated that overall microbial community composition was dictated by coral species and not extraction treatment. Finer pairwise comparisons of sequences obtained from Orbicella faveolata, Orbicella annularis, and Acropora humilis corals revealed subtle differences in community composition between the treatments; PowerBiofilm®-associated sequences generally had higher microbial richness and the highest coverage of dominant microbial groups in comparison to the UltraClean® Tissue and Cells treatments, a result likely arising from using a combination of different beads during homogenization. Both the PowerBiofilm® and UltraClean® Tissue and Cells treatments are appropriate for large-scale analyses of coral microbiota. However, studies interested in detecting cryptic microbial members may benefit from using the PowerBiofilm® DNA treatment because of the likely enhanced lysis efficiency of microbial cells attributed to using a variety of beads during homogenization. Consideration of the methodology involved with microbial DNA extraction is particularly important for studies investigating complex host-associated microbiota. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This project was supported by NSF award OCE-1233612 to AA and NSF GRFP award to LW. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Microbiome 5 (2017): 18 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/s40168-017-0229-y
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/8725
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_US
dc.relation.haspart http://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/662114
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0229-y
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.subject Coral microbiota en_US
dc.subject DNA extraction en_US
dc.subject Optimization en_US
dc.subject SSU ribosomal RNA gene en_US
dc.subject Amplicon sequencing en_US
dc.title Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 51d7f6bf-4019-4d91-8c08-418113454a1e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6cdd25d4-dec0-4201-8769-f9985fec1518
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 5035f13d-364a-4fff-9a33-75cb2a2fc0fe
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 51d7f6bf-4019-4d91-8c08-418113454a1e
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
art%3A10.1186%2Fs40168-017-0229-y.pdf
Size:
1.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
40168_2017_229_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Size:
125.26 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word
Description:
Table S1
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: