Modeling sea surface scattering by the time-domain finite-difference method
Modeling sea surface scattering by the time-domain finite-difference method
Date
1996-10
Authors
Stephen, Ralph A.
Linked Authors
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1121/1.417917
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Underwater
Sea bed
Sea surfaces
Sound waves
Backscattering
Mathematical models
Time domain analysis
Finite difference method
Sea bed
Sea surfaces
Sound waves
Backscattering
Mathematical models
Time domain analysis
Finite difference method
Abstract
A numerical scattering chamber based on the time-domain finite-difference solution of the two-way elastic wave equation is applied to a sea surface scattering problem, and excellent agreement is obtained in amplitude and phase with a reference solution obtained by an integral equation method. The sea surface roughness is one representation of a Pierson–Moskowitz spectrum for a wind speed of 15 m/s. The incident field is a 400-Hz continuous wave generated by a Gaussian tapered vertical array. This problem demonstrates a number of issues in numerical modeling of wave scattering. The spreading of Gaussian beams, even in homogeneous media, creates an asymmetry in the insonification of the surface footprint or scattering area. Because of beamspreading, Gaussian tapered vertical arrays do not generate Gaussian beams. Scattering from a rough, free, fluid surface can be accurately solved with careful treatment of the numerical boundary representing the free surface. Continuous wave (cw) scattering problems can be solved in the time domain. For the second-order, explicit, staggered finite-difference formulation used in this study, a spatial sampling of 20 points per acoustic wavelength was necessary for acceptable grid dispersion. However, to correctly compute the scattered field for the test model, it was sufficient to specify the free surface at a spatial sampling of only ten points per acoustic wavelength.
Description
Author Posting. © Acoustical Society of America, 1996. This article is posted here by permission of Acoustical Society of America for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 (1996): 2070-2078, doi:10.1121/1.417917.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 (1996): 2070-2078