Assessment of numerical simulations of deep circulation and variability in the Gulf of Mexico using recent observations

dc.contributor.author Morey, Steven L.
dc.contributor.author Gopalakrishnan, Ganesh
dc.contributor.author Pallás-Sanz, Enric
dc.contributor.author Azevedo Correia De Souza, Joao Marcos
dc.contributor.author Donohue, Kathleen A.
dc.contributor.author Pérez-Brunius, Paula
dc.contributor.author Dukhovskoy, Dmitry S.
dc.contributor.author Chassignet, Eric P.
dc.contributor.author Cornuelle, Bruce D.
dc.contributor.author Bower, Amy S.
dc.contributor.author Furey, Heather H.
dc.contributor.author Hamilton, Peter
dc.contributor.author Candela, Julio
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-20T21:03:03Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-20T21:03:03Z
dc.date.issued 2020-04-08
dc.description Author Posting. © American Meteorological Society, 2020. This article is posted here by permission of American Meteorological Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Physical Oceanography 50(4), (2020): 1045-1064, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-19-0137.1. en_US
dc.description.abstract Three simulations of the circulation in the Gulf of Mexico (the “Gulf”) using different numerical general circulation models are compared with results of recent large-scale observational campaigns conducted throughout the deep (>1500 m) Gulf. Analyses of these observations have provided new understanding of large-scale mean circulation features and variability throughout the deep Gulf. Important features include cyclonic flow along the continental slope, deep cyclonic circulation in the western Gulf, a counterrotating pair of cells under the Loop Current region, and a cyclonic cell to the south of this pair. These dominant circulation features are represented in each of the ocean model simulations, although with some obvious differences. A striking difference between all the models and the observations is that the simulated deep eddy kinetic energy under the Loop Current region is generally less than one-half of that computed from observations. A multidecadal integration of one of these numerical simulations is used to evaluate the uncertainty of estimates of velocity statistics in the deep Gulf computed from limited-length (4 years) observational or model records. This analysis shows that the main deep circulation features identified from the observational studies appear to be robust and are not substantially impacted by variability on time scales longer than the observational records. Differences in strengths and structures of the circulation features are identified, however, and quantified through standard error analysis of the statistical estimates using the model solutions. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by the Gulf Research Program of the National Academy of Sciences under Awards 2000006422 and 2000009966. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Gulf Research Program or the National Academy of Sciences. The authors acknowledge the GLORYS project for providing the ocean reanalysis data used in the ROMS simulation. GLORYS is jointly conducted by MERCATOR OCEAN, CORIOLIS, and CNRS/INSU. Installation, recovery, data acquisition, and processing of the CANEK group current-meter moorings were possible because of CICESE-PetróleosMexicanos Grant PEP-CICESE 428229851 and the dedicated work of the crew of the B/O Justo Sierra and scientists of the CANEK group. The authors thank Dr. Aljaz Maslo, CICESE, for assistance with analysis of model data. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), U.S. Dept. of the Interior, provided funding for the Lagrangian Study of the Deep Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico and the Observations and Dynamics of the Loop Current study. HYCOM simulation data are available from the HYCOM data server (https://www.hycom.org/data/goml0pt04/expt-02pt2), MITgcm data are available from the ECCO data server (http://ecco.ucsd.edu/gom_results2.html), and the ROMS simulation data are available from GRIIDC (NA.x837.000:0001). en_US
dc.identifier.citation Morey, S. L., Gopalakrishnan, G., Pallas Sanz, E., Correia De Souza,Joao Marcos Azevedo, Donohue, K., Perez-Brunius, P., Dukhovskoy, D., Chassignet, E., Cornuelle, B., Bower, A., Furey, H., Hamilton, P., & Candela, J. (2020). Assessment of numerical simulations of deep circulation and variability in the Gulf of Mexico using recent observations. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 50(4), 1045-1064. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1175/JPO-D-19-0137.1
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/26392
dc.publisher American Meteorological Society en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-19-0137.1
dc.subject Ocean circulation en_US
dc.subject Abyssal circulation en_US
dc.subject Bottom currents/bottom water en_US
dc.subject Eddies en_US
dc.subject Ocean models en_US
dc.title Assessment of numerical simulations of deep circulation and variability in the Gulf of Mexico using recent observations en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 494d4b06-b905-4971-ba46-d33eb3950852
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0f08ca08-4033-4610-a32d-14cacb893d4d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 06683ecd-66cd-4e57-af85-de015f961129
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 1c1b1f79-863b-496e-9fa0-90efc0c13f84
relation.isAuthorOfPublication fb21f9f4-4dcb-42b2-83f7-1bc2aa72fefc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 3b563038-3401-479d-b0dd-8227b19ffd2e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication cb24ca84-fdf9-4562-b051-b701756060b1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication efd201b6-fced-421a-aa82-bac8f5cb7439
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 49d325d8-8d00-4519-aa5e-96a728be4446
relation.isAuthorOfPublication acd32f6e-4783-4658-81ac-a45fe12bb659
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0addebbe-3531-4690-a684-68ace5ff110d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 2cd04209-7adf-4bdc-9d0b-f6c214ad4995
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6c9bf580-4eed-4e54-926a-ed075e1fe262
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 494d4b06-b905-4971-ba46-d33eb3950852
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jpod190137.pdf
Size:
4.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: