The electrical structure of the central Pacific upper mantle constrained by the NoMelt experiment

dc.contributor.author Sarafian, Emily K.
dc.contributor.author Evans, Rob L.
dc.contributor.author Collins, John A.
dc.contributor.author Elsenbeck, James R.
dc.contributor.author Gaetani, Glenn A.
dc.contributor.author Gaherty, James B.
dc.contributor.author Hirth, Greg
dc.contributor.author Lizarralde, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-22T18:18:46Z
dc.date.available 2015-10-18T08:15:54Z
dc.date.issued 2015-04-18
dc.description Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2015. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 16 (2015): 1115–1132, doi:10.1002/2014GC005709. en_US
dc.description.abstract The NoMelt experiment imaged the mantle beneath 70 Ma Pacific seafloor with the aim of understanding the transition from the lithosphere to the underlying convecting asthenosphere. Seafloor magnetotelluric data from four stations were analyzed using 2-D regularized inverse modeling. The preferred electrical model for the region contains an 80 km thick resistive (>103 Ωm) lithosphere with a less resistive (∼50 Ωm) underlying asthenosphere. The preferred model is isotropic and lacks a highly conductive (≤10 Ωm) layer under the resistive lithosphere that would be indicative of partial melt. We first examine temperature profiles that are consistent with the observed conductivity profile. Our profile is consistent with a mantle adiabat ranging from 0.3 to 0.5°C/km. A choice of the higher adiabatic gradient means that the observed conductivity can be explained solely by temperature. In contrast, a 0.3°C/km adiabat requires an additional mechanism to explain the observed conductivity profile. Of the plausible mechanisms, H2O, in the form of hydrogen dissolved in olivine, is the most likely explanation for this additional conductivity. Our profile is consistent with a mostly dry lithosphere to 80 km depth, with bulk H2O contents increasing to between 25 and 400 ppm by weight in the asthenosphere with specific values dependent on the choice of laboratory data set of hydrous olivine conductivity and the value of mantle oxygen fugacity. The estimated H2O contents support the theory that the rheological lithosphere is a result of dehydration during melting at a mid-ocean ridge with the asthenosphere remaining partially hydrated and weakened as a result. en_US
dc.description.embargo 2015-10-18 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Funding for the NoMELT experiment was provided by the National Science Foundation through the following grant numbers: OCE-0927172, OCE-0928270, OCE-1459649, and OCE-0928663. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 16 (2015): 1115–1132 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/2014GC005709
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/7357
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher John Wiley & Sons en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005709
dc.subject Water en_US
dc.subject Lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary en_US
dc.subject Olivine en_US
dc.subject Magnetotellurics en_US
dc.title The electrical structure of the central Pacific upper mantle constrained by the NoMelt experiment en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 894d7fdf-be97-40fe-b155-282191ed0c80
relation.isAuthorOfPublication d1163aaf-cfdc-47b5-9083-0680f06eb11b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication d880e8bd-41bf-4359-9047-c1a16df15255
relation.isAuthorOfPublication d0b8a1b9-13cc-4de7-96b4-991b032bb505
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 64805c70-cba3-4188-8e8d-824445571699
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 91adcc57-3fb1-468a-aec8-b9ce0323e710
relation.isAuthorOfPublication caef707c-8267-4519-bd0f-7557f7e1597f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 5a044922-aeef-4b0b-aa66-431ea18f2bd2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 894d7fdf-be97-40fe-b155-282191ed0c80
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ggge20710.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: