Modeling the global ocean iron cycle

dc.contributor.author Parekh, Payal
dc.contributor.author Follows, Michael J.
dc.contributor.author Boyle, Edward A.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-05-05T17:54:42Z
dc.date.available 2010-05-05T17:54:42Z
dc.date.issued 2004-01-07
dc.description Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2004. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles 18 (2004): GB1002, doi:10.1029/2003GB002061. en_US
dc.description.abstract We describe a model of the ocean transport and biogeochemical cycling of iron and the subsequent control on export production and macronutrient distributions. Ocean transport of phosphorus and iron are represented by a highly idealized six-box ocean model. Export production is parameterized simply; it is limited by light, phosphate, and iron availability in the surface ocean. We prescribe the regional variations in aeolian deposition of iron and examine three parameterizations of iron cycling in the deep ocean: (1) net scavenging onto particles, the simplest model; (2) scavenging and desorption of iron to and from particles, analogous to thorium; and (3) complexation. Provided that some unknown parameter values can be set appropriately, all three biogeochemical models are capable of reproducing the broad features of the iron distribution observed in the modern ocean and explicitly lead to regions of elevated surface phosphate, particularly in the Southern Ocean. We compare the sensitivity of Southern Ocean surface macronutrient concentration to increased aeolian dust supply for each parameterization. Both scavenging-based representations respond to increasing dust supply with a drawdown of surface phosphate in an almost linear relationship. The complexation parameterization, however, asymptotes toward a limited drawdown of phosphate under the assumption that ligand production does not respond to increased dust flux. In the scavenging based models, deep water iron concentrations and, therefore, upwelled iron continually increase with greater dust supply. In contrast, the availability of complexing ligand provides an upper limit for the deep water iron concentration in the latter model. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship M. J. F. is grateful for funding from NOAA (NA16GP2988) and NSSF (OCE-336839). P. P. is grateful to the MIT Martin Fellowship and NASA Earth System Science Fellowship (NGT5- 30362) for funding. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Global Biogeochemical Cycles 18 (2004): GB1002 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/3390
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher American Geophysical Union en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002061
dc.subject Modeling en_US
dc.subject Ocean iron cycle en_US
dc.title Modeling the global ocean iron cycle en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4be8b1f6-f9b1-4eae-9d06-5602861c55f2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4b3f602a-cfb2-4e19-b62c-9ebae0c4f191
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 22441e48-6cdb-4007-9748-77229ef71a17
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 4be8b1f6-f9b1-4eae-9d06-5602861c55f2
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2003GB002061.pdf
Size:
599.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.97 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: