High-angle wave instability and emergent shoreline shapes : 2. Wave climate analysis and comparisons to nature

Thumbnail Image
Date
2006-12-15
Authors
Ashton, Andrew D.
Murray, A. Brad
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1029/2005JF000423
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Coastline evolution
Morphodynamic instabilities
Wave climate analysis
Abstract
Recent research has revealed that the plan view evolution of a coast due to gradients in alongshore sediment transport is highly dependant upon the angles at which waves approach the shore, giving rise to an instability in shoreline shape that can generate different types of naturally occurring coastal landforms, including capes, flying spits, and alongshore sand waves. This instability merely requires that alongshore sediment flux is maximized for a given deepwater wave angle, a maximum that occurs between 35° and 50° for several common alongshore sediment transport formulae. Here we introduce metrics that sum over records of wave data to quantify the long-term stability of wave climates and to investigate how wave climates change along a coast. For Long Point, a flying spit on the north shore of Lake Erie, Canada, wave climate metrics suggest that unstable waves have shaped the spit and, furthermore, that smaller-scale alongshore sand waves occur along the spit at the same locations where the wave climate becomes unstable. A shoreline aligned along the trend of the Carolina Capes, United States, would be dominated by high-angle waves; numerical simulations driven by a comparable wave climate develop a similarly shaped cuspate coast. Local wave climates along these simulated capes and the Carolina Capes show similar trends: Shoreline reorientation and shadowing from neighboring capes causes most of the coast to experience locally stable wave climates despite regional instability.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2006. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research 111 (2006): F04012, doi:10.1029/2005JF000423.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research 111 (2006): F04012
Cruises
Cruise ID
Cruise DOI
Vessel Name