Global-mean marine δ13C and its uncertainty in a glacial state estimate
Global-mean marine δ13C and its uncertainty in a glacial state estimate
Date
2015-08
Authors
Gebbie, Geoffrey A.
Peterson, Carlye D.
Lisiecki, Lorraine E.
Spero, Howard J.
Peterson, Carlye D.
Lisiecki, Lorraine E.
Spero, Howard J.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Paleoceanography
Physical Oceanography
Carbon reservoirs
Last Glacial Maximum
Inverse methods
Physical Oceanography
Carbon reservoirs
Last Glacial Maximum
Inverse methods
Abstract
A paleo-data compilation with 492 δ13C and δ18O observations provides the opportunity
to better sample the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and infer its global
properties, such as the mean δ13C of dissolved inorganic carbon. Here, the paleocompilation
is used to reconstruct a steady-state water-mass distribution for the
LGM, that in turn is used to map the data onto a 3D global grid. A global-mean
marine δ13C value and a self-consistent uncertainty estimate are derived using the
framework of state estimation (i.e., combining a numerical model and observations).
The LGM global-mean δ13C is estimated to be 0:14h±0:20h at the
two standard error level, giving a glacial-to-modern change of 0:32h±0:20h.
The magnitude of the error bar is attributed to the uncertain glacial ocean circulation
and the lack of observational constraints in the Pacific, Indian, and Southern
Oceans. Observations in the Indian and Pacific Oceans generally have 10 times
the weight of an Atlantic point in the computation of the global mean. To halve
the error bar, roughly four times more observations are needed, although strategic
sampling may reduce this number. If dynamical constraints can be used to better
characterize the LGM circulation, the error bar can also be reduced to 0:05 to 0:1h, emphasizing that knowledge of the circulation is vital to accurately map
δ13CDIC in three dimensions.
Description
Author Posting. © The Author(s), 2015. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Elsevier for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Quaternary Science Reviews 125 (2015): 144-159, doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.08.010.