Submesoscale processes promote seasonal restratification in the Subantarctic Ocean

Thumbnail Image
Date
2017-04-08
Authors
du Plessis, Marcel
Swart, Sebastiaan
Ansorge, Isabelle
Mahadevan, Amala
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1002/2016JC012494
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Ocean gliders
Southern Ocean
Seasonal stratification
1-D mixed-layer model
Mixed layer eddies
Ekman buoyancy flux
Abstract
Traditionally, the mechanism driving the seasonal restratification of the Southern Ocean mixed layer (ML) is thought to be the onset of springtime warming. Recent developments in numerical modeling and North Atlantic observations have shown that submesoscale ML eddies (MLE) can drive a restratifying flux to shoal the deep winter ML prior to solar heating at high latitudes. The impact of submesoscale processes on the intraseasonal variability of the Subantarctic ML is still relatively unknown. We compare 5 months of glider data in the Subantarctic Zone to simulations of a 1-D mixing model to show that the magnitude of restratification of the ML cannot be explained by heat, freshwater, and momentum fluxes alone. During early spring, we estimate that periodic increases in the vertical buoyancy flux by MLEs caused small increases in stratification, despite predominantly down-front winds that promote the destruction of stratification. The timing of seasonal restratification was consistent between 1-D model estimates and the observations. However, during up-front winds, the strength of springtime stratification increased over twofold compared to the 1-D model, with a rapid shoaling of the MLD from >200 m to <100 m within a few days. The ML stratification is further modified under a negative Ekman buoyancy flux during down-front winds, resulting in the destruction of ML stratification and deepening of the MLD. These results propose the importance of submesoscale buoyancy fluxes enhancing seasonal restratification and mixing of the Subantarctic ML.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2017. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 122 (2017): 2960–2975, doi:10.1002/2016JC012494.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 122 (2017): 2960–2975
Cruises
Cruise ID
Cruise DOI
Vessel Name