Ultrastructure and distribution of kleptoplasts in benthic foraminifera from shallow-water (photic) habitats
Ultrastructure and distribution of kleptoplasts in benthic foraminifera from shallow-water (photic) habitats
Date
2017-10
Authors
Jauffrais, Thierry
LeKieffre, Charlotte
Koho, Karoliina
Tsuchiya, Masashi
Schweizer, Magali
Bernhard, Joan M.
Meibom, Anders
Geslin, Emmanuelle
LeKieffre, Charlotte
Koho, Karoliina
Tsuchiya, Masashi
Schweizer, Magali
Bernhard, Joan M.
Meibom, Anders
Geslin, Emmanuelle
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Kleptoplasty
Protist
Chloroplast
TEM
Transmission electron microscope
Protist
Chloroplast
TEM
Transmission electron microscope
Abstract
Assimilation, sequestration and maintenance of foreign chloroplasts inside an organism is termed
“chloroplast sequestration” or “kleptoplasty”. This phenomenon is known in certain benthic
foraminifera, in which such kleptoplasts can be found both intact and functional, but with different
retention times depending on foraminiferal species. In the present study, seven species of benthic
foraminifera (Haynesina germanica, Elphidium williamsoni, E. selseyense, E. oceanense, E. aff. E.
crispum, Planoglabratella opercularis and Ammonia sp.) were collected from shallow-water benthic
habitats and examined with transmission electron microscope (TEM) for cellular ultrastructure to
ascertain attributes of kleptoplasts. Results indicate that all these foraminiferal taxa actively obtain
kleptoplasts but organized them differently within their endoplasm. In some species, the kleptoplasts
were evenly distributed throughout the endoplasm (e.g., H. germanica, E. oceanense, Ammonia sp.),
whereas other species consistently had plastids distributed close to the external cell membrane (e.g.,
Elphidium williamsoni, E. selseyense, P. opercularis). Chloroplast degradation also seemed to differ
between species, as many degraded plastids were found in Ammonia sp. and E. oceanense compared to
other investigated species. Digestion ability, along with different feeding and sequestration strategies
may explain the differences in retention time between taxa. Additionally, the organization of the
sequestered plastids within the endoplasm may also suggest behavioral strategies to expose and/or
protect the sequestered plastids to/from light and/or to favor gas and/or nutrient exchange with their
surrounding habitats.
Description
© The Author(s), 2017. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here under a nonexclusive, irrevocable, paid-up, worldwide license granted to WHOI. It is made available for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Marine Micropaleontology 138 (2018): 46-62, doi:10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.10.003.