Toward modeling turbulent suspension of sand in the nearshore

dc.contributor.author Hsu, Tian-Jian
dc.contributor.author Liu, Philip L.-F.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-04T18:37:24Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-04T18:37:24Z
dc.date.issued 2004-06-18
dc.description Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2004. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research 109 (2004): C06018, doi:10.1029/2003JC002240. en_US
dc.description.abstract We present two depth- and phase-resolving models, based on single- and two-phase approaches for suspended sediment transport under water waves. Both models are the extension of a wave hydrodynamic model Cornell Breaking Wave and Structure (COBRAS). In the two-phase approach, dilute two-phase mass and momentum equations are calculated along with a fluid turbulence closure based on balance equations for the fluid turbulence kinetic energy k f and its dissipation rate ε f . In the single-phase approach the fluid flow is described by the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations, while the sediment concentration is calculated by an advection-diffusion equation for the conservation of sediment mass. The fluid turbulence is calculated by k f -ε f equations that incorporate the essential influence of sediment, which can also be consistently deduced from the two-phase theory. By adopting a commonly used sediment flux boundary condition near the bed the proposed models are tested against laboratory measurements of suspended sediment under nonbreaking skewed water waves and shoaling broken waves. Although the models predict wave-averaged sediment concentrations reasonably well, the corresponding time histories of instantaneous sediment concentration are less accurate. We demonstrate that this is due to the uncertainties in the near-bed sediment boundary conditions. In addition, we show that under breaking waves the near-bed sediment pickup cannot be solely parameterized by the bottom friction, suggesting that other effects may also influence the near-bed sediment boundary conditions. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This research has been supported by NSF grants CTS-0000675 and OCE-0095834 to Cornell University. This paper is also a resulting product [R/CCP-9] funded under award NA16RG1645 from the National Sea Grant College Program of U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to the Research Foundation of State University of New York on behalf of New York Sea Grant. The financial supports for Tian-Jian Hsu provided by Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, and the Coastal Ocean Institute of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution are also acknowledged. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Geophysical Research 109 (2004): C06018 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1029/2003JC002240
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/3583
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher American Geophysical Union en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002240
dc.subject Turbulent suspension en_US
dc.subject Suspended sediment en_US
dc.subject Pick-up function en_US
dc.title Toward modeling turbulent suspension of sand in the nearshore en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication ae1d55a9-b17d-4991-a788-28ec5587e820
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 59740b4c-1350-4926-b261-633b043ecb80
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ae1d55a9-b17d-4991-a788-28ec5587e820
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2003JC002240.pdf
Size:
381.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.97 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: