Comparison of rip current hazard likelihood forecasts with observed rip current speeds

dc.contributor.author Moulton, Melissa
dc.contributor.author Dusek, Gregory
dc.contributor.author Elgar, Steve
dc.contributor.author Raubenheimer, Britt
dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-02T16:10:17Z
dc.date.available 2018-02-28T09:52:53Z
dc.date.issued 2017-08-28
dc.description Author Posting. © American Meteorological Society, 2017. This article is posted here by permission of American Meteorological Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Weather and Forecasting 32 (2017): 1659-1666, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-17-0076.1. en_US
dc.description.abstract Although rip currents are a major hazard for beachgoers, the relationship between the danger to swimmers and the physical properties of rip current circulation is not well understood. Here, the relationship between statistical model estimates of hazardous rip current likelihood and in situ velocity observations is assessed. The statistical model is part of a forecasting system that is being made operational by the National Weather Service to predict rip current hazard likelihood as a function of wave conditions and water level. The temporal variability of rip current speeds (offshore-directed currents) observed on an energetic sandy beach is correlated with the hindcasted hazard likelihood for a wide range of conditions. High likelihoods and rip current speeds occurred for low water levels, nearly shore-normal wave angles, and moderate or larger wave heights. The relationship between modeled hazard likelihood and the frequency with which rip current speeds exceeded a threshold was assessed for a range of threshold speeds. The frequency of occurrence of high (threshold exceeding) rip current speeds is consistent with the modeled probability of hazard, with a maximum Brier skill score of 0.65 for a threshold speed of 0.23 m s−1, and skill scores greater than 0.60 for threshold speeds between 0.15 and 0.30 m s−1. The results suggest that rip current speed may be an effective proxy for hazard level and that speeds greater than ~0.2 m s−1 may be hazardous to swimmers. en_US
dc.description.embargo 2018-02-28 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation (1232910, 1332705, and 1536365), and by National Security Science and Engineering and Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowships funded by the assistant secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Weather and Forecasting 32 (2017): 1659-1666 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1175/WAF-D-17-0076.1
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/9344
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher American Meteorological Society en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0076.1
dc.subject Coastlines en_US
dc.subject Coastal flows en_US
dc.subject Waves, oceanic en_US
dc.subject Forecast verification/skill en_US
dc.subject Probability forecasts/models/distribution en_US
dc.subject Statistical forecasting en_US
dc.title Comparison of rip current hazard likelihood forecasts with observed rip current speeds en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 390564fd-a46e-4766-9d8e-e91fc885a836
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 883b3917-b321-4fc5-8517-1850129c495a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6ff6bfa4-a04b-4351-942d-504154442af9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6d4661cf-5623-4ec1-99c4-24f8c57bb6d7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 390564fd-a46e-4766-9d8e-e91fc885a836
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Moulton et al._Weather and Forecasting_2017.pdf
Size:
1.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: