Extratropical storm inundation testbed : intermodel comparisons in Scituate, Massachusetts

dc.contributor.author Chen, Changsheng
dc.contributor.author Beardsley, Robert C.
dc.contributor.author Luettich, Richard A.
dc.contributor.author Westerink, Joannes J.
dc.contributor.author Wang, Harry
dc.contributor.author Perrie, Will
dc.contributor.author Xu, Qichun
dc.contributor.author Donahue, Aaron S.
dc.contributor.author Qi, Jianhua
dc.contributor.author Lin, Huichan
dc.contributor.author Zhao, Liuzhi
dc.contributor.author Kerr, Patrick C.
dc.contributor.author Meng, Yanqiu
dc.contributor.author Toulany, Bash
dc.date.accessioned 2014-01-22T19:42:22Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-22T08:57:21Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10-07
dc.description Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2013. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 118 (2013): 5054–5073, doi:10.1002/jgrc.20397. en_US
dc.description.abstract The Integrated Ocean Observing System Super-regional Coastal Modeling Testbed had one objective to evaluate the capabilities of three unstructured-grid fully current-wave coupled ocean models (ADCIRC/SWAN, FVCOM/SWAVE, SELFE/WWM) to simulate extratropical storm-induced inundation in the US northeast coastal region. Scituate Harbor (MA) was chosen as the extratropical storm testbed site, and model simulations were made for the 24–27 May 2005 and 17–20 April 2007 (“Patriot's Day Storm”) nor'easters. For the same unstructured mesh, meteorological forcing, and initial/boundary conditions, intermodel comparisons were made for tidal elevation, surface waves, sea surface elevation, coastal inundation, currents, and volume transport. All three models showed similar accuracy in tidal simulation and consistency in dynamic responses to storm winds in experiments conducted without and with wave-current interaction. The three models also showed that wave-current interaction could (1) change the current direction from the along-shelf direction to the onshore direction over the northern shelf, enlarging the onshore water transport and (2) intensify an anticyclonic eddy in the harbor entrance and a cyclonic eddy in the harbor interior, which could increase the water transport toward the northern peninsula and the southern end and thus enhance flooding in those areas. The testbed intermodel comparisons suggest that major differences in the performance of the three models were caused primarily by (1) the inclusion of wave-current interaction, due to the different discrete algorithms used to solve the three wave models and compute water-current interaction, (2) the criterions used for the wet-dry point treatment of the flooding/drying process simulation, and (3) bottom friction parameterizations. en_US
dc.description.embargo 2014-04-07 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This project was supported by NOAA via the U.S.IOOS Office (award: NA10NOS0120063 and NA11NOS0120141) and was managed by the Southeastern Universities Research Association. The Scituate FVCOM setup was supported by the NOAA-funded IOOS NERACOOS program for NECOFS and the MIT Sea Grant College Program through grant 2012-R/RC-127. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 118 (2013): 5054–5073 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/jgrc.20397
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/6376
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher John Wiley & Sons en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20397
dc.subject Intermodel comparisons en_US
dc.subject Inundation prediction en_US
dc.title Extratropical storm inundation testbed : intermodel comparisons in Scituate, Massachusetts en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c9ace44d-d98b-4228-90a2-44f1f4b8d3a2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 7d561059-e834-40a5-ba1e-bcb98f4bafd8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication cf9cd434-5d24-4718-b344-40b20bd4f260
relation.isAuthorOfPublication fe8df4ac-dff4-4a04-b58a-ec74f9aeabdf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 631164cf-59f4-46b4-ae8d-2ba0d4dd5610
relation.isAuthorOfPublication b7a44207-6bfd-4e00-b0e2-155caa39d514
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 706745bf-6652-468c-8b0d-a521e2102ade
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 376a3c04-ece3-4ea9-8c36-d5f9762912bd
relation.isAuthorOfPublication b6480c1c-09a4-4e95-a896-05b225170ed8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 3a49ef1e-7ba9-4767-87d5-f83498e74226
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 525ae202-58e8-47a1-bd09-cd88ae2c2cec
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 5cb553c2-418c-4c2d-8b48-c2ae54578a09
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4b42d517-8acd-4a10-aaa6-04f855b89996
relation.isAuthorOfPublication ea5e0058-72e7-49f5-999e-e48c12270ac8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery c9ace44d-d98b-4228-90a2-44f1f4b8d3a2
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jgrc20397.pdf
Size:
2.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: