Marsh-atmosphere CO2 exchange in a New England salt marsh
Marsh-atmosphere CO2 exchange in a New England salt marsh
Date
2015-09-29
Authors
Forbrich, Inke
Giblin, Anne E.
Giblin, Anne E.
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1002/2015JG003044
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Salt marsh
Eddy covariance
Inundation
NDVI
Tide
Carbon
Eddy covariance
Inundation
NDVI
Tide
Carbon
Abstract
We studied marsh-atmosphere exchange of carbon dioxide in a high marsh dominated salt marsh during the months of May to October in 2012–2014. Tidal inundation at the site occurred only during biweekly spring tides, during which we observed a reduction in fluxes during day and night. We estimated net ecosystem exchange (NEE), gross primary production (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (Reco) using a modified PLIRTLE model, which requires photosynthetically active radiation, temperature, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as control variables. NDVI decreased during inundation, when the marsh canopy was submerged. Two-time series of NDVI, including and excluding effects of tidal inundation, allowed us to quantify the flux reduction during inundation. The effect of the flux reduction was small (2–4%) at our site, but is likely higher for marshes at a lower elevation. From May to October, GPP averaged −863 g C m−2, Reco averaged 591 g C m−2, and NEE averaged −291 g C m−2. In 2012, which was an exceptionally warm year, we observed an early start of net carbon uptake but higher respiration than in 2013 and 2014 due to higher-air temperature in August. This resulted in the lowest NEE during the study period (−255.9±6.9 g C m−2). The highest seasonal net uptake (−336.5±6.3 g C m−2) was observed in 2013, which was linked to higher rainfall and temperature in July. Mean sea level was very similar during all 3 years which allowed us to isolate the importance of climatic factors.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2015. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 120 (2015): 1825–1838, doi:10.1002/2015JG003044.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 120 (2015): 1825–1838