Regional differences in phosphorus budgets in intensive soybean agriculture
Regional differences in phosphorus budgets in intensive soybean agriculture
Date
2013-01
Authors
Riskin, Shelby H.
Porder, Stephen
Schipanski, Meagan E.
Bennett, Elena M.
Neill, Christopher
Porder, Stephen
Schipanski, Meagan E.
Bennett, Elena M.
Neill, Christopher
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1525/bio.2013.63.1.10
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Phosphorus
Fertilizer
Soybean
Agriculture
Environment
Fertilizer
Soybean
Agriculture
Environment
Abstract
Fertilizer-intensive agriculture has been integral to increasing food production over the past half century but has been accompanied by environmental
costs. We use case studies of phosphorus fertilizer use in the world’s most productive soybean-growing regions, Iowa (United States), Mato
Grosso (Brazil), and Buenos Aires (Argentina), to examine influences of management and soil type on agriculture’s most prevalent phosphorusrelated
environmental consequences: eutrophication and consumption of Earth’s finite phosphorus reserves. With increasing phosphorus inputs,
achieving high yields on tropical soils with high phosphorus-binding capacity is becoming more common. This system has low eutrophication
risks but increases demands on phosphorus supplies. In contrast, production in traditional breadbaskets, on soils with lower phosphorus-binding
capacities, is being sustained with decreasing phosphorus inputs. However, in these regions, historical overuse of phosphorus may mean continued
eutrophication risk even as pressures on phosphorus reserves diminish. We focus here on soybean production but illustrate how achieving sustainable
agriculture involves an intricate optimization of local, regional, and global considerations.
Description
Author Posting. © American Institute of Biological Sciences, 2013. This article is posted here by permission of University of California Press for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in BioScience 63 (2013): 49-54, doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.1.10.
Embargo Date
Citation
BioScience 63 (2013): 49-54