Are deep-ocean-generated surface-wave microseisms observed on land?

Thumbnail Image
Date
2013-07-25
Authors
Bromirski, Peter D.
Stephen, Ralph A.
Gerstoft, Peter
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1002/jgrb.50268
Replaced By
Keywords
Double-frequency microseisms
Deep-ocean wave interactions
Pseudo-Rayleigh waves
Near-coastal DF microseism generation
Beamforming
Time-domain finite-difference
Abstract
Recent studies attribute land double-frequency (DF) microseism observations to deep water generation. Here we show that near-coastal generation is generally the dominant source region. This determination is based on observations at land and ocean seismic stations, buoys, gravity-wave hindcasts, and on beamforming results from continental seismic arrays. Interactions between opposing ocean wave components generate a pressure excitation pulse at twice the ocean wave frequency that excites pseudo-Rayleigh (pRg) wave DF microseisms. pRg generated in shallow coastal waters have most of their energy in the solid Earth (“elastic” pRg) and are observed by land-based and seafloor seismometers as DF microseisms. pRg generated in the deep ocean have most of their energy in the ocean (“acoustic” pRg) and are continuously observed on the ocean bottom, but acoustic pRg does not efficiently transition onto continents. High-amplitude DF signals over the [0.2, 0.3] Hz band observed on the deep seafloor are uncorrelated with continental observations and are not clearly detectable at individual continental stations or by land seismic-array beamforming. Below 0.2 Hz, modeling and some observations suggest that some deep water-generated elastic pRg energy can reach continental stations, providing that losses from scattering and transition across the continental-shelf boundary to the shore are not substantial. However, most observations indicate that generally little deep-ocean-generated DF microseism energy reaches continental stations. Effectively, DF land observations are dominated by near-coastal wave activity.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2013. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118 (2013): 3610–3629, doi:10.1002/jgrb.50268.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118 (2013): 3610–3629
Cruises
Cruise ID
Cruise DOI
Vessel Name