Characterization of new microsatellite loci for population genetic studies in the Smooth Cauliflower Coral (Stylophora sp.)
Characterization of new microsatellite loci for population genetic studies in the Smooth Cauliflower Coral (Stylophora sp.)
Date
2013-01-09
Authors
Banguera-Hinestroza, Eulalia
Saenz-Agudelo, Pablo
Bayer, Till
Berumen, Michael L.
Voolstra, Christian R.
Saenz-Agudelo, Pablo
Bayer, Till
Berumen, Michael L.
Voolstra, Christian R.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1007/s12686-012-9852-x
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Stylophora
Tetra and dinucleotide microsatellites
Red Sea
Coral
Tetra and dinucleotide microsatellites
Red Sea
Coral
Abstract
A total of one hundred microsatellites loci were selected from the draft genome of Stylophora pistillata and evaluated in previously characterized samples of Stylophora cf pistillata from the Red Sea. 17 loci were amplified successfully and tested in 24 individuals from samples belonging to a single population from the central region of the Red Sea. The number of alleles ranged from 3 to 15 alleles per locus, while observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.292 to 0.95. Six of these loci showed significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) expectations, and 4/136 paired loci comparisons suggested linkage disequilibrium after Bonferroni corrections. After excluding loci with significant HWE deviation and evidence of null alleles, average genetic diversity over loci in the population studied (N = 24, Nloci = 11) was 0.701 ± 0.380. This indicates that these loci can be used effectively to evaluate genetic diversity and undertake population genetics studies in Stylophora sp. populations.
Description
© The Author(s), 2013. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Conservation Genetics Resources 5 (2013): 561-563, doi:10.1007/s12686-012-9852-x.
Embargo Date
Citation
Conservation Genetics Resources 5 (2013): 561-563