Captive dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, develop signature whistles that match acoustic features of human-made model sounds
Captive dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, develop signature whistles that match acoustic features of human-made model sounds
Date
2002-08
Authors
Miksis, Jennifer L.
Tyack, Peter L.
Buck, John R.
Tyack, Peter L.
Buck, John R.
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1121/1.1496079
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Acoustic field
Acoustic signal processing
Biocommunications
Speech
Acoustic variables measurement
Acoustic signal processing
Biocommunications
Speech
Acoustic variables measurement
Abstract
This paper presents a cross-sectional study testing whether dolphins that are born in aquarium pools where they hear trainers' whistles develop whistles that are less frequency modulated than those of wild dolphins. Ten pairs of captive and wild dolphins were matched for age and sex. Twenty whistles were sampled from each dolphin. Several traditional acoustic features (total duration, duration minus any silent periods, etc.) were measured for each whistle, in addition to newly defined flatness parameters: total flatness ratio (percentage of whistle scored as unmodulated), and contiguous flatness ratio (duration of longest flat segment divided by total duration). The durations of wild dolphin whistles were found to be significantly longer, and the captive dolphins had whistles that were less frequency modulated and more like the trainers' whistles. Using a standard t-test, the captive dolphin had a significantly higher total flatness ratio in 9/10 matched pairs, and in 8/10 pairs the captive dolphin had significantly higher contiguous flatness ratios. These results suggest that captive-born dolphins can incorporate features of artificial acoustic models made by humans into their signature whistles.
Description
Author Posting. © Acoustical Society of America, 2002. This article is posted here by permission of Acoustical Society of America for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (2002): 728-739, doi:10.1121/1.1496079.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (2002): 728-739