Regenerative capacity in the lamprey spinal cord is not altered after a repeated transection

dc.contributor.author Hanslik, Kendra
dc.contributor.author Allen, Scott R.
dc.contributor.author Harkenrider, Tessa L.
dc.contributor.author Fogerson, Stephanie M.
dc.contributor.author Guadarrama, Eduardo
dc.contributor.author Morgan, Jennifer R.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-20T15:09:16Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-20T15:09:16Z
dc.date.issued 2019-01-30
dc.description © The Author(s), 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in PLoS One 14(1), (2019):e0204193, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204193. en_US
dc.description.abstract The resilience of regeneration in vertebrates is not very well understood. Yet understanding if tissues can regenerate after repeated insults, and identifying limitations, is important for elucidating the underlying mechanisms of tissue plasticity. This is particularly challenging in tissues, such as the nervous system, which possess a large number of terminally differentiated cells and often exhibit limited regeneration in the first place. However, unlike mammals, which exhibit very limited regeneration of spinal cord tissues, many non-mammalian vertebrates, including lampreys, bony fishes, amphibians, and reptiles, regenerate their spinal cords and functionally recover even after a complete spinal cord transection. It is well established that lampreys undergo full functional recovery of swimming behaviors after a single spinal cord transection, which is accompanied by tissue repair at the lesion site, as well as axon and synapse regeneration. Here we begin to explore the resilience of spinal cord regeneration in lampreys after a second spinal transection (re-transection). We report that by all functional and anatomical measures tested, lampreys regenerate after spinal re-transection just as robustly as after single transections. Recovery of swimming, synapse and cytoskeletal distributions, axon regeneration, and neuronal survival were nearly identical after spinal transection or re-transection. Only minor differences in tissue repair at the lesion site were observed in re-transected spinal cords. Thus, regenerative potential in the lamprey spinal cord is largely unaffected by spinal re-transection, indicating a greater persistent regenerative potential than exists in some other highly regenerative models. These findings establish a new path for uncovering pro-regenerative targets that could be deployed in non-regenerative conditions. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The authors would like to thank Dr. Cristina Roman-Vendrell and Louie Kerr, Director of the Central Microscopy Facility at the MBL, for technical support. We also thank Dr. Juan Diaz-Quiroz for helpful comments on the manuscript. EG was supported in part by an NSF REU Award (#1659604: Biological Discovery in Woods Hole at the Marine Biological Laboratory). en_US
dc.identifier.citation Hanslik, K. L., Allen, S. R., Harkenrider, T. L., Fogerson, S. M., Guadarrama, E., & Morgan, J. R. (2019). Regenerative capacity in the lamprey spinal cord is not altered after a repeated transection. Plos One, 14(1), e0204193 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0204193
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/23683
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204193
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.title Regenerative capacity in the lamprey spinal cord is not altered after a repeated transection en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication fce1b72f-46b6-4b66-b089-7aac27abd32b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 86091729-8763-441b-a7e0-385b41c5bd28
relation.isAuthorOfPublication a6d82156-4b1d-41bb-b2cb-febcc8eedc5d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication e92e9902-5af6-479a-aae1-da1e602a83f5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 963b24e4-0f80-45dc-975d-b3f6f4facab3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication fee9919b-270a-4f54-bce0-36080a45d9f9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery fce1b72f-46b6-4b66-b089-7aac27abd32b
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 5 of 6
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0204193.pdf
Size:
5.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
plos_Hanslik_Article
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
pone.0204193.s001.xlsx
Size:
23.3 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel
Description:
S1 Appendix
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pone.0204193.s002.jpg
Size:
503.22 KB
Format:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Description:
S1_Figure
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pone.0204193.s003.jpg
Size:
414.53 KB
Format:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Description:
S2_Figure
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pone.0204193.s004.jpg
Size:
775.01 KB
Format:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Description:
S3_Figure
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: