Holocene sediment distribution on the inner continental shelf of northeastern South Carolina : implications for the regional sediment budget and long-term shoreline response

dc.contributor.author Denny, Jane F.
dc.contributor.author Schwab, William C.
dc.contributor.author Baldwin, Wayne E.
dc.contributor.author Barnhardt, Walter A.
dc.contributor.author Gayes, Paul T.
dc.contributor.author Morton, Robert A.
dc.contributor.author Warner, John C.
dc.contributor.author Driscoll, Neal W.
dc.contributor.author Voulgaris, George
dc.date.accessioned 2013-06-26T19:25:57Z
dc.date.available 2013-06-26T19:25:57Z
dc.date.issued 2013-02-26
dc.description This paper is not subject to U.S. copyright. The definitive version was published in Continental Shelf Research 56 (2013): 56-70, doi:10.1016/j.csr.2013.02.004. en_US
dc.description.abstract High-resolution geophysical and sediment sampling surveys were conducted offshore of the Grand Strand, South Carolina to define the shallow geologic framework of the inner shelf. Results are used to identify and map Holocene sediment deposits, infer sediment transport pathways, and discuss implications for the regional coastal sediment budget. The thickest deposits of Holocene sediment observed on the inner shelf form shoal complexes composed of moderately sorted fine sand, which are primarily located offshore of modern tidal inlets. These shoal deposits contain ∼67 M m3 of sediment, approximately 96% of Holocene sediment stored on the inner shelf. Due to the lack of any significant modern fluvial input of sand to the region, the Holocene deposits are likely derived from reworking of relict Pleistocene and older inner-shelf deposits during the Holocene marine transgression. The Holocene sediments are concentrated in the southern part of the study area, due to a combination of ancestral drainage patterns, a regional shift in sediment supply from the northeast to the southwest in the late Pleistocene, and proximity to modern inlet systems. Where sediment is limited, only small, low relief ridges have formed and Pleistocene and older deposits are exposed on the seafloor. The low-relief ridges are likely the result of a thin, mobile veneer of sediment being transported across an irregular, erosional surface formed during the last transgression. Sediment textural trends and seafloor morphology indicate a long-term net transport of sediment to the southwest. This is supported by oceanographic studies that suggest the long-term sediment transport direction is controlled by the frequency and intensity of storms that pass through the region, where low pressure systems yield net along-shore flow to the southwest and a weak onshore component. Current sediment budget estimates for the Grand Strand yield a deficit for the region. Volume calculations of Holocene deposits on the inner shelf suggest that there is sufficient sediment to balance the sediment budget and provide a source of sediment to the shoreline. Although the processes controlling cross-shelf sediment transport are not fully understood, in sediment-limited environments such as the Grand Strand, erosion of the inner shelf likely contributes significant sediment to the beach system. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Continental Shelf Research 56 (2013): 56-70 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.csr.2013.02.004
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/6021
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier B.V. en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.02.004
dc.subject Holocene sediment en_US
dc.subject Coastal erosion en_US
dc.subject Long Bay en_US
dc.subject South Carolina en_US
dc.subject Sediment budget en_US
dc.title Holocene sediment distribution on the inner continental shelf of northeastern South Carolina : implications for the regional sediment budget and long-term shoreline response en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 57e2807b-48ae-4f3e-9f71-56978e1959e4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c93baba8-3894-4958-9ddb-198543b37c3c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 951b3d5a-48be-4fd6-8512-b3b058d2e73f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4cccfc84-8680-437a-8c7b-91b6088290f0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 980e5a64-9eb8-4165-8026-da7f3e133e9b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6c0bb215-9f0d-4b79-8d13-d3ba140e6f9c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication ba0bd959-7ec3-4820-b01a-eccf998b39a1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 23fa253a-b7d3-49ec-952f-46ec7cefd789
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 660756cd-0582-4cec-8b70-93700e050349
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 57e2807b-48ae-4f3e-9f71-56978e1959e4
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0278434313000538-main.pdf
Size:
4.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: