Spring bloom dynamics and zooplankton biomass response on the US Northeast Continental Shelf

dc.contributor.author Friedland, Kevin D.
dc.contributor.author Leaf, Robert T.
dc.contributor.author Kane, Joe
dc.contributor.author Tommasi, Desiree
dc.contributor.author Asch, Rebecca G.
dc.contributor.author Rebuck, Nathan D.
dc.contributor.author Ji, Rubao
dc.contributor.author Large, Scott I.
dc.contributor.author Stock, Charles A.
dc.contributor.author Saba, Vincent S.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-29T18:05:21Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-29T18:05:21Z
dc.date.issued 2015-04-07
dc.description This paper is not subject to U.S. copyright. The definitive version was published in Continental Shelf Research 102 (2015): 47-61, doi:10.1016/j.csr.2015.04.005. en_US
dc.description.abstract The spring phytoplankton bloom on the US Northeast Continental Shelf is a feature of the ecosystem production cycle that varies annually in timing, spatial extent, and magnitude. To quantify this variability, we analyzed remotely-sensed ocean color data at two spatial scales, one based on ecologically defined sub-units of the ecosystem (production units) and the other on a regular grid (0.5°). Five units were defined: Gulf of Maine East and West, Georges Bank, and Middle Atlantic Bight North and South. The units averaged 47×103 km2 in size. The initiation and termination of the spring bloom were determined using change-point analysis with constraints on what was identified as a bloom based on climatological bloom patterns. A discrete spring bloom was detected in most years over much of the western Gulf of Maine production unit. However, bloom frequency declined in the eastern Gulf of Maine and transitioned to frequencies as low as 50% along the southern flank of the Georges Bank production unit. Detectable spring blooms were episodic in the Middle Atlantic Bight production units. In the western Gulf of Maine, bloom duration was inversely related to bloom start day; thus, early blooms tended to be longer lasting and larger magnitude blooms. We view this as a phenological mismatch between bloom timing and the “top-down” grazing pressure that terminates a bloom. Estimates of secondary production were available from plankton surveys that provided spring indices of zooplankton biovolume. Winter chlorophyll biomass had little effect on spring zooplankton biovolume, whereas spring chlorophyll biomass had mixed effects on biovolume. There was evidence of a “bottom up” response seen on Georges Bank where spring zooplankton biovolume was positively correlated with the concentration of chlorophyll. However, in the western Gulf of Maine, biovolume was uncorrelated with chlorophyll concentration, but was positively correlated with bloom start and negatively correlated with magnitude. This observation is consistent with both a “top-down” mechanism of control of the bloom and a “bottom-up” effect of bloom timing on zooplankton grazing. Our inability to form a consistent model of these relationships across adjacent systems underscores the need for further research. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype application/msword
dc.identifier.citation Continental Shelf Research 102 (2015): 47-61 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.csr.2015.04.005
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/7260
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2015.04.005
dc.subject Spring bloom en_US
dc.subject US Northeast Shelf en_US
dc.subject Zooplankton biomass en_US
dc.subject Bloom timing en_US
dc.subject Climate en_US
dc.title Spring bloom dynamics and zooplankton biomass response on the US Northeast Continental Shelf en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 8aaeb928-cd44-40d1-81ec-ddde7412d44d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication f2821ecc-bcc8-4fa2-83dd-97912fab3a98
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 72867095-0826-4e36-ac30-c8784b4421b0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 14219af9-cffc-411a-a78b-7bf2585dbe11
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 92a49837-49ed-4f08-a05b-7484f978e8fb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6ea355fa-4f33-4921-ab36-f338870f24d9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication d51f79bd-533c-47e7-a3a9-a1fdd303433c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication f2ac9e97-b93e-4fd5-9ee9-e16fc836f46d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 9b5fcb63-256b-4b83-b5ba-e2dbe5f41948
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4a4615b2-8d01-4767-867b-86969521f084
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 8aaeb928-cd44-40d1-81ec-ddde7412d44d
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Friedland etal 2015 CSR.pdf
Size:
2.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
mmc1.doc
Size:
35.88 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word
Description:
Supplementary material
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections