Comparing call-based versus subunit-based methods for categorizing Norwegian killer whale, Orcinus orca, vocalizations

dc.contributor.author Shapiro, Ari D.
dc.contributor.author Tyack, Peter L.
dc.contributor.author Seneff, Stephanie
dc.date.accessioned 2011-03-30T13:41:58Z
dc.date.available 2011-03-30T13:41:58Z
dc.date.issued 2010-08-13
dc.description Author Posting. © The Author(s), 2010. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Elsevier B.V. for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Animal Behaviour 81 (2011): 377-386, doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.020. en_US
dc.description.abstract Students of animal communication face significant challenges when deciding how to categorise calls into subunits, calls, and call series. Here, we use algorithms designed to parse human speech to test different approaches for categorising calls of killer whales. Killer whale vocalisations have traditionally been categorised by humans into discrete call types. These calls often contain internal spectral shifts, periods of silence, and synchronously produced low and high frequency components, suggesting that they may be composed of subunits. We describe and compare three different approaches for modelling Norwegian killer whale calls. The first method considered the whole call as the basic unit of analysis. Inspired by human speech processing techniques, the second and third methods represented the calls in terms of subunits. Subunits may provide a more parsimonious approach to modelling the vocal stream since (1) there were fewer subunits than call types; (2) nearly 75% of all call types shared at least one subunit. We show that contour traces from stereotyped Norwegian killer whale calls yielded similar automatic classification performance using either whole calls or subunits. We also demonstrate that subunits derived from Norwegian stereotyped calls were detected in some Norwegian variable (non-stereotyped) calls as well as the stereotyped calls of other killer whale populations. Further work is required to test whether killer whales use subunits to generate and categorize their vocal repertoire. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The undergraduate students were supported by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program office and the Ocean Life Institute (OLI) at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). Field work was financed by the OLI, National Geographic Society and WWF Sweden. A. D. Shapiro was funded by a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship and the WHOI Academic Programs Office. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/4429
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.020
dc.subject Killer whale en_US
dc.subject Subunit en_US
dc.subject Vocalisations en_US
dc.subject Call type en_US
dc.title Comparing call-based versus subunit-based methods for categorizing Norwegian killer whale, Orcinus orca, vocalizations en_US
dc.type Preprint en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 578c56ce-b09b-4f95-b6d5-a6e0dcd4d19c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c63678f6-df4a-4b30-b5fe-11109baacff8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 8acc167f-8b95-4c31-a8cc-b68abd688783
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 578c56ce-b09b-4f95-b6d5-a6e0dcd4d19c
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ANBEH-D-09-00540.pdf
Size:
3.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections