Sperm whale codas may encode individuality as well as clan identity
Sperm whale codas may encode individuality as well as clan identity
Date
2016-05-19
Authors
Oliveira, Claudia
Wahlberg, Magnus
Silva, Monica A.
Johnson, Mark P.
Antunes, Ricardo
Wisniewska, Danuta M.
Fais, Andrea
Goncalves, Joao M. A.
Madsen, Peter T.
Wahlberg, Magnus
Silva, Monica A.
Johnson, Mark P.
Antunes, Ricardo
Wisniewska, Danuta M.
Fais, Andrea
Goncalves, Joao M. A.
Madsen, Peter T.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Files
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1121/1.4949478
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Abstract
Sperm whales produce codas for communication that can be grouped into different types according to their temporal patterns. Codas have led researchers to propose that sperm whales belong to distinct cultural clans, but it is presently unclear if they also convey individual information. Coda clicks comprise a series of pulses and the delay between pulses is a function of organ size, and therefore body size, and so is one potential source of individual information. Another potential individual-specific parameter could be the inter-click intervals within codas. To test whether these parameters provide reliable individual cues, stereo-hydrophone acoustic tags (Dtags) were attached to five sperm whales of the Azores, recording a total of 802 codas. A discriminant function analysis was used to distinguish 288 5 Regular codas from four of the sperm whales and 183 3 Regular codas from two sperm whales. The results suggest that codas have consistent individual features in their inter-click intervals and inter-pulse intervals which may contribute to individual identification. Additionally, two whales produced different coda types in distinct foraging dive phases. Codas may therefore be used by sperm whales to convey information of identity as well as activity within a social group to a larger extent than previously assumed.
Description
Author Posting. © Acoustical Society of America, 2016. This article is posted here by permission of Acoustical Society of America for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139 (2016): 2860, doi:10.1121/1.4949478.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139 (2016): 2860