Luteinizing Hormone is an effective replacement for hCG to induce ovulation in Xenopus
Luteinizing Hormone is an effective replacement for hCG to induce ovulation in Xenopus
Date
2016-06-02
Authors
Wlizla, Marcin
Falco, Rosalia
Peshkin, Leonid
Parlow, Albert F.
Horb, Marko E.
Falco, Rosalia
Peshkin, Leonid
Parlow, Albert F.
Horb, Marko E.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.05.028
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Xenopus laevis
J strain
Luteinizing Hormone
Ovulation
Chorionic gonadotropin
J strain
Luteinizing Hormone
Ovulation
Chorionic gonadotropin
Abstract
Injection of human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) directly into the dorsal lymph sac of Xenopus is a commonly used protocol for induction of ovulation, but recent shortages in the stocks of commercially available hCG as well as lack of a well tested alternative have resulted in frustrating experimental delays in laboratories that predominantly use Xenopus in their research. Mammalian Luteinizing Hormones (LH) share structural similarity, functional equivalency, and bind the same receptor as hCG; this suggests that LH may serve as a good alternative to hCG for promoting ovulation in Xenopus. LH has been found to induce maturation of Xenopus oocytes in vitro, but whether it can be used to induce ovulation in vivo has not been examined. Here we compared the ability of four mammalian LH proteins, bovine (bLH), human (hLH), ovine (oLH), porcine (pLH), to induce ovulation in Xenopus when injected into the dorsal lymph sac of sexually mature females. We find that both ovine and human LH, but not bovine or porcine, are good substitutes for hCG for induction of ovulation in WT and J strain Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis.
Description
© The Author(s), 2016. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Developmental Biology 426 (2017): 442–448, doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.05.028.
Embargo Date
Citation
Developmental Biology 426 (2017): 442–448