Korneliussen
Rolf J.
Korneliussen
Rolf J.
No Thumbnail Available
2 results
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 2 of 2
-
ArticleMicronekton biomass distribution, improved estimates across four north Atlantic basins(Elsevier, 2019-11-27) Klevjer, Thor A. ; Melle, Webjørn ; Knutsen, Tor ; Strand, Espen ; Korneliussen, Rolf J. ; Dupont, Nicolas ; Vea Salvanes, Anne Gro ; Wiebe, PeterDistribution of micronekton was investigated during early summer of 2013, using data from a cruise covering the central parts of four north Atlantic basins, the Norwegian Sea (NS), Iceland Sea (ICS), Irminger Sea (IRS), and Labrador Sea (LS). Continuous underway acoustics mapped vertical and horizontal distributions, and trawl sampling provided data on biomass and taxonomic composition. The hull mounted acoustics and trawl catches suggested that, among the four basins, biomass of epipelagic, larger nektonic species (>20 cm length) during the cruise was highest in the NS and ICS basins, while mesopelagic non-gelatinous micronekton biomass peaked in the IRS and LS basins. Biomass of Scyphozoa was also about 1 order of magnitude higher in IRS and LS compared to ICS and NS. In ICS and NS, crustaceans made up about 50% of total non-gelatinous micronekton biomass, with fish making up less than 20% of total biomass. In contrast, fish constituted more than 60% of non-gelatinous biomass of catches in IRS and LS. In catches from ICS and NS the myctophid Benthosema glaciale dominated the catches, whereas bathylagids, gonostomatids, barracudinas and stomiids contributed to the high biomass densities of fish in IRS and LS. In addition to the differences in biomass between the basins, the acoustic measurements suggested gradients within the north-eastern basins, and large differences in vertical distribution of biomass between the basins during the cruise.
-
ArticleStructure and functioning of four North Atlantic ecosystems - a comparative study(Elsevier, 2020-09-11) Melle, Webjørn ; Klevjer, Thor A. ; Drinkwater, Ken F. ; Strand, Espen ; Naustvoll, Lars Johan ; Wiebe, Peter ; Aksnes, Dag L. ; Knutsen, Tor ; Sundby, Svein ; Slotte, Aril ; Dupont, Nicolas ; Vea Salvanes, Anne Gro ; Korneliussen, Rolf J. ; Huse, GeirThe epi- and mesopelagic ecosystems of four sub-polar ocean basins, the Labrador, Irminger, Iceland and Norwegian seas, were surveyed during two legs from Bergen, Norway, to Nuuk, Greenland, and back to Bergen. The survey was conducted from 1 May to 14 June, and major results were published in five papers (Drinkwater et al., Naustvoll et al., Strand et al., Melle et al., this issue, and Klevjer et al., this issue a, this issue b). In the present paper, the structures of the ecosystem are reviewed, and aspects of the functioning of the ecosystems examined, focusing on a comparison of trophic relationships in the four basins. In many ways, the ecosystems are similar, which is not surprising since they are located at similar latitudes and share many hydrographic characteristics, like input of both warm and saline Atlantic water, as well as cold and less saline Arctic water. Literature review suggests that total annual primary production is intermediate in the eastern basins and peaks in the Labrador Sea, while the Irminger Sea is the most oligotrophic sea. This was not reflected in the measurements of different trophic levels taken during the cruise. The potential new production was estimated to be higher in the Irminger Sea than in the eastern basins, and while the biomass of mesozooplankton was similar across basins, the biomass of mesopelagic micronekton was about one order of magnitude higher in the western basins, and peaked in the Irminger Sea, where literature suggests annual primary production is at its lowest. The eastern basins hold huge stocks of pelagic planktivore fish stocks like herring, mackerel and blue whiting, none of which are abundant in the western seas. As both epipelagic nekton and mesopelagic micronekton primarily feed on the mesozooplankton, there is likely competitive interactions between the epipelagic and mesopelagic, but we're currently unable to explain the estimated ~1 order of magnitude difference in micronekton standing stock. The results obtained during the survey highlight that even if some aspects of pelagic ecosystems are well understood, we currently do not understand overall pelagic energy flow in the North Atlantic.