Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArrigo, Kevin R.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorMills, Matthew M.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorVan Dijken, Gert  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorLowry, Kate E.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorPickart, Robert S.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorSchlitzer, Reiner  Concept link
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T17:34:18Z
dc.date.available2018-03-18T08:32:52Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-18
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 122 (2017): 2409–2417en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1912/9335
dc.descriptionAuthor Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2017. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 122 (2017): 2409–2417, doi:10.1002/2017JG003881.en_US
dc.description.abstractMeasurements of late springtime nutrient concentrations in Arctic waters are relatively rare due to the extensive sea ice cover that makes sampling difficult. During the SUBICE (Study of Under-ice Blooms In the Chukchi Ecosystem) cruise in May–June 2014, an extensive survey of hydrography and prebloom concentrations of inorganic macronutrients, oxygen, particulate organic carbon and nitrogen, and chlorophyll a was conducted in the northeastern Chukchi Sea. Cold (<−1.5°C) winter water was prevalent throughout the study area, and the water column was weakly stratified. Nitrate (NO3−) concentration averaged 12.6 ± 1.92 μM in surface waters and 14.0 ± 1.91 μM near the bottom and was significantly correlated with salinity. The highest NO3− concentrations were associated with winter water within the Central Channel flow path. NO3− concentrations were much reduced near the northern shelf break within the upper halocline waters of the Canada Basin and along the eastern side of the shelf near the Alaskan coast. Net community production (NCP), estimated as the difference in depth-integrated NO3− content between spring (this study) and summer (historical), varied from 28 to 38 g C m−2 a−1. This is much lower than previous NCP estimates that used NO3− concentrations from the southeastern Bering Sea as a baseline. These results demonstrate the importance of using profiles of NO3− measured as close to the beginning of the spring bloom as possible when estimating local NCP. They also show that once the snow melts in spring, increased light transmission through the sea ice to the waters below the ice could fuel large phytoplankton blooms over a much wider area than previously known.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF Office of Polar Programs Grant Numbers: PLR-1304563, PLR-1303617en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003881
dc.subjectChukchi Seaen_US
dc.subjectNitrateen_US
dc.subjectPhytoplanktonen_US
dc.titleLate spring nitrate distributions beneath the ice-covered northeastern Chukchi Shelfen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.embargo2018-03-18en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/2017JG003881


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record