Designing a solution to enable agency-academic scientific collaboration for disasters
Mease, Lindley A.
Erickson, Ashley L.
Ludwig, Kristin A.
Reddy, Christopher M.
MetadataShow full item record
KeywordDeepwater Horizon; Disaster response; Human-centered design; Scientific collaboration; Systems analysis
As large-scale environmental disasters become increasingly frequent and more severe globally, people and organizations that prepare for and respond to these crises need efficient and effective ways to integrate sound science into their decision making. Experience has shown that integrating nongovernmental scientific expertise into disaster decision making can improve the quality of the response, and is most effective if the integration occurs before, during, and after a crisis, not just during a crisis. However, collaboration between academic, government, and industry scientists, decision makers, and responders is frequently difficult because of cultural differences, misaligned incentives, time pressures, and legal constraints. Our study addressed this challenge by using the Deep Change Method, a design methodology developed by Stanford ChangeLabs, which combines human-centered design, systems analysis, and behavioral psychology. We investigated underlying needs and motivations of government agency staff and academic scientists, mapped the root causes underlying the relationship failures between these two communities based on their experiences, and identified leverage points for shifting deeply rooted perceptions that impede collaboration. We found that building trust and creating mutual value between multiple stakeholders before crises occur is likely to increase the effectiveness of problem solving. We propose a solution, the Science Action Network, which is designed to address barriers to scientific collaboration by providing new mechanisms to build and improve trust and communication between government administrators and scientists, industry representatives, and academic scientists. The Science Action Network has the potential to ensure cross-disaster preparedness and science-based decision making through novel partnerships and scientific coordination.
© The Author(s), 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Ecology and Society 22 (2017): 18, doi:10.5751/ES-09246-220218.
Suggested CitationEcology and Society 22 (2017): 18
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Scientific rationale and conceptual design of a process-oriented shelfbreak observatory: the OOI pioneer array Gawarkiewicz, Glen G.; Plueddemann, Albert J. (Taylor & Francis, 2019-10-23)The Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) of the National Science Foundation in the USA includes a coastal observatory called the OOI Pioneer Array, which is focused on understanding shelf/slope exchange processes. The OOI ...
Scientific challenges and present capabilities in underwater robotic vehicle design and navigation for oceanographic exploration under-ice Barker, Laughlin D. L.; Jakuba, Michael V.; Bowen, Andrew D.; German, Christopher R.; Maksym, Ted; Mayer, Larry A.; Boetius, Antje; Dutrieux, Pierre; Whitcomb, Louis L. (MDPI, 2020-08-11)This paper reviews the scientific motivation and challenges, development, and use of underwater robotic vehicles designed for use in ice-covered waters, with special attention paid to the navigation systems employed for ...