Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchnell, Alexandra K.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorHanlon, Roger T.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorBenkada, Aïcha  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorjozet-alves, christelle  Concept link
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T15:20:06Z
dc.date.available2017-01-10T15:20:06Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-12
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Physiology 7 (2016): 620en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1912/8648
dc.description© The Author(s), 2016. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Frontiers in Physiology 7 (2016): 620, doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00620.en_US
dc.description.abstractVertebrates with laterally placed eyes typically exhibit preferential eye use for ecological activities such as scanning for predators or prey. Processing visual information predominately through the left or right visual field has been associated with specialized function of the left and right brain. Lateralized vertebrates often share a general pattern of lateralized brain function at the population level, whereby the left hemisphere controls routine behaviors and the right hemisphere controls emergency responses. Recent studies have shown evidence of preferential eye use in some invertebrates, but whether the visual fields are predominately associated with specific ecological activities remains untested. We used the European common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis, to investigate whether the visual field they use is the same, or different, during anti-predatory, and predatory behavior. To test for lateralization of anti-predatory behavior, individual cuttlefish were placed in a new environment with opaque walls, thereby obliging them to choose which eye to orient away from the opaque wall to scan for potential predators (i.e., vigilant scanning). To test for lateralization of predatory behavior, individual cuttlefish were placed in the apex of an isosceles triangular arena and presented with two shrimp in opposite vertexes, thus requiring the cuttlefish to choose between attacking a prey item to the left or to the right of them. Cuttlefish were significantly more likely to favor the left visual field to scan for potential predators and the right visual field for prey attack. Moreover, individual cuttlefish that were leftward directed for vigilant scanning were predominately rightward directed for prey attack. Lateralized individuals also showed faster decision-making when presented with prey simultaneously. Cuttlefish appear to have opposite directions of lateralization for anti-predatory and predatory behavior, suggesting that there is functional specialization of each optic lobe (i.e., brain structures implicated in visual processing). These results are discussed in relation to the role of lateralized brain function and the evolution of population level lateralization.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by a post-doctoral study grant from the Fyssen Foundation to AS, and by a research grant “Sélavie” from the Fyssen Foundation to CJ-A. The Sholley Foundation provided partial support for the research in Woods Hole.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00620
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleLateralization of eye use in cuttlefish : opposite direction for anti-predatory and predatory behaviorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2016.00620


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International