Dynamic response of electromagnetic current meters

View/ Open
Date
1984-05Author
Aubrey, David G.
Concept link
Spencer, Wayne D.
Concept link
Trowbridge, John H.
Concept link
Metadata
Show full item recordCitable URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1912/8595DOI
10.1575/1912/8595Abstract
The dynamic response of electromagnetic current meters (manufactured
by Marsh-McBirney, Inc.) has been clarified through a comprehensive laboratory
measurement program combined with a thorough literature review. Elucidation
of the behavior of these flowmeters under a variety of dynamic conditions has
been neglected in the past. Since flow past a spherical body has considerable
hydrodynamic complexity for different dynamic conditions, a careful laboratory
study was carried out for pure steady, pure oscillatory (horizontal plane), and
combined steady/oscillatory conditions at two test facilities. Test results
indicate that flowmeter behavior under pure steady flow is excellent in the
absence of high levels of free-stream turbulence, with an r.m.s. error of 1-5
cm/sec. These errors could· be reduced with a higher-order polynomial regression
fit. Pure oscillatory response was also excellent, with r.m.s. errors of
1-2 cm/sec, and sensitivity which is correlated with the oscillatory Reynolds
number, (Re)o, and the Keulegan-Carpenter number, (A/d). Combined steady/oscillatory flows degraded current meter performance with larger residual
errors (1-6 em/sec) and significant differences in sensitivity (up to
20°/o). Horizontal cosine response showed systematic deviations from pure
cosine behavior, with a notable inter-cardinal undersensitivity and cosine
"shoulder" at lower Reynolds numbers. Error analysis shows these current
sensors are adequate for many kinematic measurements, but may lead to excessive
errors when using velocity to calculate dynamical quantities (such as bottom
friction, Reynolds Stress, or log-layer friction velocities). A careful error
analysis must precede any use of these meters for estimating dynamical quantities.
These studies pointed out a potential difficulty in using these meters
in areas of large ambient turbulence levels (20°/o turbulent intensities),
which are characteristic of many near-bottom shallow water environments.
Further study is needed to clarify this behavior.
Collections
Suggested Citation
Technical Report: Aubrey, David G., Spencer, Wayne D., Trowbridge, John H., "Dynamic response of electromagnetic current meters", 1984-05, DOI:10.1575/1912/8595, https://hdl.handle.net/1912/8595Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
A performance update of the InterOcean S4 electromagnetic current meter
Clay, Peter R.; Longworth, Steven P. (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1986-10)This report reviews the working principles of the InterOcean S4 electromagnetic current meter and outlines the practical difficulties and engineering solutions to convert these basic principles into a working ... -
Moored current meter data from the Atlantic north equatorial counter current near 6°N 28°W (February-September, 1983) : vol. XXXIV
Levy, Ellen; Richardson, Philip L. (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1984-05)This report presents current and wind data from the first of three surface mooring deployments in the Atlantic North Equatorial Countercurrent near 6°N and 28°W. A Vector Averaging Wind Recorder (VAWR) measured wind ... -
Summary of current meter operations in 1968
McCullough, James R.; Tupper, George H. (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1969-03)This report describes work done with Geodyne current meters and wind recorders during 1968. Techniques for testing instruments prior to use at sea, instrument performance at sea and instrument changes evolved during the ...