Public opinion and the environmental, economic and aesthetic impacts of offshore wind
Date
2015-11Metadata
Show full item recordCitable URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1912/7804As published
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.11.018Keyword
Wind power; Public opinion; Uncertainty; Expert elicitationAbstract
During ten-plus years of debate over the proposed Cape Wind facility off Cape Cod, Massachusetts, the public’s understanding of its environmental, economic, and visual impacts matured. Tradeoffs also have become apparent to scientists and decision-makers during two environmental impact statement reviews and other stakeholder processes. Our research aims to show how residents’ opinions changed during the debate over this first-of-its-kind project in relation to understandings of project impacts. Our methods included an examination of public opinion polls and the refereed literature that traces public attitudes and knowledge about Cape Wind. Next we conducted expert elicitations to compare trends with the level of understanding held by small groups of scientists and Cape Cod stakeholders. Our review found that Massachusetts residents became more supportive of the project while our research demonstrated the gap between scientific and lay knowledge diminished late in the debate. To facilitate planning for other offshore energy projects, we recommend steps to move the public to an informed position more quickly.
Description
© The Author(s), 2015. This is the author's version of the work and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Ocean & Coastal Management 120 (2016): 70-79, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.11.018.
Collections
Suggested Citation
Preprint: Bush, Drew, Hoagland, Porter, "Public opinion and the environmental, economic and aesthetic impacts of offshore wind", 2015-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.11.018, https://hdl.handle.net/1912/7804The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
African baobabs with false inner cavities : the radiocarbon investigation of the Lebombo Eco Trail Baobab
Patrut, Adrian; Woodborne, Stephan; von Reden, Karl F.; Hall, Grant; Hofmeyr, Michele; Lowy, Daniel A.; Patrut, Roxana T. (Public Library of Science, 2015-01-26)The article reports the radiocarbon investigation results of the Lebombo Eco Trail tree, a representative African baobab from Mozambique. Several wood samples collected from the large inner cavity and from the outer part ... -
Microbial iron mats at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and evidence that Zetaproteobacteria may be restricted to iron-oxidizing marine systems
Scott, Jarrod J.; Breier, John A.; Luther, George W.; Emerson, David (Public Library of Science, 2015-03-11)Chemolithoautotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria play an essential role in the global iron cycle. Thus far, the majority of marine iron-oxidizing bacteria have been identified as Zetaproteobacteria, a novel class within the ... -
Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
Sitch, Stephen; Friedlingstein, Pierre; Gruber, Nicolas; Jones, S. D.; Murray-Tortarolo, G.; Ahlstrom, Andreas P.; Doney, Scott C.; Graven, Heather; Heinze, Christoph; Huntingford, Chris; Levis, Samuel; Levy, Peter E.; Lomas, Mark; Poulter, Benjamin; Viovy, Nicolas; Zaehle, Sonke; Zeng, Ning; Arneth, Almut; Bonan, Gordon B.; Bopp, Laurent; Canadell, Josep G.; Chevallier, Frédéric; Ciais, Philippe; Ellis, Richard; Gloor, Emanuel; Peylin, Philippe; Piao, S. L.; Le Quere, Corinne; Smith, Benjamin; Zhu, Zaichun; Myneni, Ranga (Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union, 2015-02-02)The land and ocean absorb on average just over half of the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) every year. These CO2 "sinks" are modulated by climate change and variability. Here we use a suite of nine dynamic ...