Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGelfand, Ilya  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorCui, Mengdi  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorTang, Jianwu  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, G. Philip  Concept link
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-05T16:01:39Z
dc.date.available2015-08-05T16:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-17
dc.identifier.citationAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 212 (2015): 127-133en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1912/7447
dc.description© The Author(s), 2015. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 212 (2015): 127-133, doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.005.en_US
dc.description.abstractClimate change is causing the intensification of both rainfall and droughts in temperate climatic zones, which will affect soil drying and rewetting cycles and associated processes such as soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes. We investigated the effect of soil rewetting following a prolonged natural drought on soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in an agricultural field recently converted from 22 years in the USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). We compared responses to those in a similarly managed field with no CRP history and to a CRP reference field. We additionally compared soil GHG emissions measured by static flux chambers with off-site laboratory analysis versus in situ analysis using a portable quantum cascade laser and infrared gas analyzer. Under growing season drought conditions, average soil N2O fluxes ranged between 0.2 and 0.8 μg N m−2 min−1 and were higher in former CRP soils and unaffected by nitrogen (N) fertilization. After 18 days of drought, a 50 mm rewetting event increased N2O fluxes by 34 and 24 fold respectively in the former CRP and non-CRP soils. Average soil CO2 emissions during drought ranged from 1.1 to 3.1 mg C m−2 min−1 for the three systems. CO2 emissions increased ∼2 fold after the rewetting and were higher from soils with higher C contents. Observations are consistent with the hypothesis that during drought soil N2O emissions are controlled by available C and following rewetting additionally influenced by N availability, whereas soil CO2 emissions are independent of short-term N availability. Finally, soil GHG emissions estimated by off-site and in situ methods were statistically identical.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support for this work was provided by the DOE Office of Science (DE-FC02-07ER64494) and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (DE-AC05-76RL01830), the US National Science Foundation LTER program (DEB 1027253), and MSU AgBioResearch. J. Tang and M. Cui were supported additionally by NSF/DBI-959333, Brown University seed funding, and the Brown University–Marine Biological Laboratory graduate program in Biological and Environmental Sciences.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msword
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.005
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectSoil carbonen_US
dc.subjectConservation reserve programen_US
dc.subjectN2O methodologyen_US
dc.subjectCornen_US
dc.subjectNo-tillen_US
dc.titleShort-term drought response of N2O and CO2 emissions from mesic agricultural soils in the US Midwesten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.005


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International