GEOTRACES radium isotopes interlaboratory comparison experiment

View/ Open
Date
2012-06Author
Charette, Matthew A.
Concept link
Dulaiova, Henrieta
Concept link
Gonneea, Meagan E.
Concept link
Henderson, Paul B.
Concept link
Moore, Willard S.
Concept link
Scholten, Jan C.
Concept link
Pham, Mai Khanh
Concept link
Metadata
Show full item recordCitable URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1912/6627As published
https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.451DOI
10.4319/lom.2012.10.451Abstract
In anticipation of the international GEOTRACES program, which will study the global marine biogeochemistry of trace elements and isotopes, we conducted a multi-lab intercomparison for radium isotopes. The intercomparison was in two parts involving the distribution of: (1) samples collected from four marine environments (open ocean, continental slope, shelf, and estuary) and (2) a suite of four reference materials prepared with isotopic standards (circulated to participants as 'unknowns'). Most labs performed well with 228Ra and 224Ra determination, however, there were a number of participants that reported 226Ra, 223Ra, and 228Th (supported 224Ra) well outside the 95% confidence interval. Many outliers were suspected to be a result of poorly calibrated detectors, though other method specific factors likely played a role (e.g., detector leakage, insufficient equilibration). Most methods for radium analysis in seawater involve a MnO2 fiber column preconcentration step; as such, we evaluated the extraction efficiency of this procedure and found that it ranged from an average of 87% to 94% for the four stations. Hence, nonquantitative radium recovery from seawater samples may also have played a role in lab-to-lab variability.
Description
Author Posting. © Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography, 2012. This article is posted here by permission of Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 10 (2012): 451-463, doi:10.4319/lom.2012.10.451.