Historical and idealized climate model experiments : an intercomparison of Earth system models of intermediate complexity

View/ Open
Date
2013-05-16Author
Eby, Michael
Concept link
Weaver, Andrew J.
Concept link
Alexander, K.
Concept link
Zickfeld, K.
Concept link
Abe-Ouchi, A.
Concept link
Cimatoribus, A. A.
Concept link
Crespin, E.
Concept link
Drijfhout, Sybren
Concept link
Edwards, N. R.
Concept link
Eliseev, A. V.
Concept link
Feulner, G.
Concept link
Fichefet, T.
Concept link
Forest, Chris E.
Concept link
Goosse, H.
Concept link
Holden, P. B.
Concept link
Joos, Fortunat
Concept link
Kawamiya, M.
Concept link
Kicklighter, David W.
Concept link
Kienert, H.
Concept link
Matsumoto, K.
Concept link
Mokhov, I. I.
Concept link
Monier, Erwan
Concept link
Olsen, Steffen M.
Concept link
Pedersen, J. O. P.
Concept link
Perrette, M.
Concept link
Philippon-Berthier, G.
Concept link
Ridgwell, Andy
Concept link
Schlosser, A.
Concept link
Schneider von Deimling, T.
Concept link
Shaffer, G.
Concept link
Smith, R. S.
Concept link
Spahni, R.
Concept link
Sokolov, Andrei P.
Concept link
Steinacher, M.
Concept link
Tachiiri, K.
Concept link
Tokos, K.
Concept link
Yoshimori, M.
Concept link
Zeng, Ning
Concept link
Zhao, F.
Concept link
Metadata
Show full item recordCitable URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1912/6215As published
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1111-2013DOI
10.5194/cp-9-1111-2013Abstract
Both historical and idealized climate model experiments are performed with a variety of Earth system models of intermediate complexity (EMICs) as part of a community contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report. Historical simulations start at 850 CE and continue through to 2005. The standard simulations include changes in forcing from solar luminosity, Earth's orbital configuration, CO2, additional greenhouse gases, land use, and sulphate and volcanic aerosols. In spite of very different modelled pre-industrial global surface air temperatures, overall 20th century trends in surface air temperature and carbon uptake are reasonably well simulated when compared to observed trends. Land carbon fluxes show much more variation between models than ocean carbon fluxes, and recent land fluxes appear to be slightly underestimated. It is possible that recent modelled climate trends or climate–carbon feedbacks are overestimated resulting in too much land carbon loss or that carbon uptake due to CO2 and/or nitrogen fertilization is underestimated. Several one thousand year long, idealized, 2 × and 4 × CO2 experiments are used to quantify standard model characteristics, including transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities, and climate–carbon feedbacks. The values from EMICs generally fall within the range given by general circulation models. Seven additional historical simulations, each including a single specified forcing, are used to assess the contributions of different climate forcings to the overall climate and carbon cycle response. The response of surface air temperature is the linear sum of the individual forcings, while the carbon cycle response shows a non-linear interaction between land-use change and CO2 forcings for some models. Finally, the preindustrial portions of the last millennium simulations are used to assess historical model carbon-climate feedbacks. Given the specified forcing, there is a tendency for the EMICs to underestimate the drop in surface air temperature and CO2 between the Medieval Climate Anomaly and the Little Ice Age estimated from palaeoclimate reconstructions. This in turn could be a result of unforced variability within the climate system, uncertainty in the reconstructions of temperature and CO2, errors in the reconstructions of forcing used to drive the models, or the incomplete representation of certain processes within the models. Given the forcing datasets used in this study, the models calculate significant land-use emissions over the pre-industrial period. This implies that land-use emissions might need to be taken into account, when making estimates of climate–carbon feedbacks from palaeoclimate reconstructions.
Description
© The Author(s), 2013. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Climate of the Past 9 (2013): 1111-1140, doi:10.5194/cp-9-1111-2013.
Collections
Suggested Citation
Climate of the Past 9 (2013): 1111-1140The following license files are associated with this item:
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Application of an inverse model in the community modeling effort results
Zhang, Huai-Min (Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1995-02)Inverse modeling activities in oceanography have recently been intensified, aided by the oncoming observational data stream of WOCE and the advance of computer power. However, interpretations of inverse model results ... -
Modeling for understanding v. modeling for numbers
Rastetter, Edward B. (2016-11)I draw a distinction between Modeling for Numbers, which aims to address how much, when, and where questions, and Modeling for Understanding, which aims to address how and why questions. For-numbers models are often ... -
Model behavior and sensitivity in an application of the Cohesive Bed Component of the Community Sediment Transport Modeling System for the York River estuary, VA, USA
Fall, Kelsey A.; Harris, Courtney K.; Friedrichs, Carl T.; Rinehimer, J. Paul; Sherwood, Christopher R. (MDPI AG, 2014-05-19)The Community Sediment Transport Modeling System (CSTMS) cohesive bed sub-model that accounts for erosion, deposition, consolidation, and swelling was implemented in a three-dimensional domain to represent the York River ...